TSTP Solution File: SYN364+1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : SYN364+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 02:50:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.72s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN364+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 06:49:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.72/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.72/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.72/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.72/1.09  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Clauses:
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  { ! big_p( X, Y ), big_p( Z, Z ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  { big_p( X, skol1( X ) ), big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  { big_p( X, skol1( X ) ), big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  { ! big_q( X ), ! big_m( g( X ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  { ! big_p( g( skol2 ), X ), ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 0.600000
% 0.72/1.09  This a non-horn, non-equality problem
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Options Used:
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  useres =            1
% 0.72/1.09  useparamod =        0
% 0.72/1.09  useeqrefl =         0
% 0.72/1.09  useeqfact =         0
% 0.72/1.09  usefactor =         1
% 0.72/1.09  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.72/1.09  usesimpdemod =      0
% 0.72/1.09  usesimpres =        3
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.72/1.09  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.72/1.09  substype =          standard
% 0.72/1.09  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.72/1.09  selectoldest =      5
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.72/1.09  litorderings [1] =  liftord
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  termordering =      none
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  litapriori =        1
% 0.72/1.09  termapriori =       0
% 0.72/1.09  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.72/1.09  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.72/1.09  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.72/1.09  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  litselect =         none
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  maxweight =         15
% 0.72/1.09  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.72/1.09  maxlength =         115
% 0.72/1.09  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.72/1.09  excuselevel =       1
% 0.72/1.09  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.72/1.09  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  showgenerated =    0
% 0.72/1.09  showkept =         0
% 0.72/1.09  showselected =     0
% 0.72/1.09  showdeleted =      0
% 0.72/1.09  showresimp =       1
% 0.72/1.09  showstatus =       2000
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  prologoutput =     0
% 0.72/1.09  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.72/1.09  totalproof =       1
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:22, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  big_p  [37, 2]      (w:1, o:46, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  big_m  [41, 1]      (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  f  [42, 2]      (w:1, o:47, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  big_q  [43, 1]      (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  g  [45, 1]      (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  skol1  [46, 1]      (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.72/1.09  skol2  [47, 0]      (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Starting Search:
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.72/1.09  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.72/1.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  (0) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V3,M2} I { big_p( Z, Z ), ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (1) {G0,W6,D3,L2,V1,M1} I { big_m( X ), big_p( X, skol1( X ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (2) {G0,W9,D4,L2,V1,M1} I { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ), big_p( X, skol1( X
% 0.72/1.09     ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (3) {G0,W5,D3,L2,V1,M1} I { ! big_m( g( X ) ), ! big_q( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (4) {G0,W7,D3,L2,V1,M2} I { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ), ! big_p( g( skol2 ), X
% 0.72/1.09     ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (5) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V2,M1} R(1,0) { big_m( X ), big_p( Y, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (9) {G1,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2} R(4,0) { ! big_p( X, Y ), ! big_p( skol2, skol2 )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  (10) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} F(9) { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (13) {G3,W2,D2,L1,V1,M1} R(10,5) { big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (14) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V2,M1} R(10,0) { ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (15) {G4,W5,D4,L1,V1,M1} R(14,2) { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (16) {G5,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(15,3);r(13) {  }.
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.72/1.09  found a proof!
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  (18) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V3,M2}  { ! big_p( X, Y ), big_p( Z, Z ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (19) {G0,W6,D3,L2,V1,M2}  { big_p( X, skol1( X ) ), big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (20) {G0,W9,D4,L2,V1,M2}  { big_p( X, skol1( X ) ), big_q( f( X, skol1( X )
% 0.72/1.09     ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (21) {G0,W5,D3,L2,V1,M2}  { ! big_q( X ), ! big_m( g( X ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  (22) {G0,W7,D3,L2,V1,M2}  { ! big_p( g( skol2 ), X ), ! big_p( skol2, skol2
% 0.72/1.09     ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Total Proof:
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (0) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V3,M2} I { big_p( Z, Z ), ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (18) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V3,M2}  { ! big_p( X, Y ), big_p( Z, Z ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09     Y := Y
% 0.72/1.09     Z := Z
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.72/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (1) {G0,W6,D3,L2,V1,M1} I { big_m( X ), big_p( X, skol1( X ) )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (19) {G0,W6,D3,L2,V1,M2}  { big_p( X, skol1( X ) ), big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.72/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (2) {G0,W9,D4,L2,V1,M1} I { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ), big_p
% 0.72/1.09    ( X, skol1( X ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (20) {G0,W9,D4,L2,V1,M2}  { big_p( X, skol1( X ) ), big_q( f( X, 
% 0.72/1.09    skol1( X ) ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.72/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (3) {G0,W5,D3,L2,V1,M1} I { ! big_m( g( X ) ), ! big_q( X )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (21) {G0,W5,D3,L2,V1,M2}  { ! big_q( X ), ! big_m( g( X ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.72/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (4) {G0,W7,D3,L2,V1,M2} I { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ), ! big_p( 
% 0.72/1.09    g( skol2 ), X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (22) {G0,W7,D3,L2,V1,M2}  { ! big_p( g( skol2 ), X ), ! big_p( 
% 0.72/1.09    skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.72/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resolution: (23) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { big_p( X, X ), big_m( Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[1]: (0) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V3,M2} I { big_p( Z, Z ), ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent1[1]: (1) {G0,W6,D3,L2,V1,M1} I { big_m( X ), big_p( X, skol1( X ) )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := Y
% 0.72/1.09     Y := skol1( Y )
% 0.72/1.09     Z := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.72/1.09     X := Y
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (5) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V2,M1} R(1,0) { big_m( X ), big_p( Y, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (23) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { big_p( X, X ), big_m( Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := Y
% 0.72/1.09     Y := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.72/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resolution: (25) {G1,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ), ! big_p( X
% 0.72/1.09    , Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[1]: (4) {G0,W7,D3,L2,V1,M2} I { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ), ! big_p( g
% 0.72/1.09    ( skol2 ), X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent1[0]: (0) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V3,M2} I { big_p( Z, Z ), ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := g( skol2 )
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09     Y := Y
% 0.72/1.09     Z := g( skol2 )
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (9) {G1,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2} R(4,0) { ! big_p( X, Y ), ! big_p( 
% 0.72/1.09    skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (25) {G1,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ), ! big_p( X, Y
% 0.72/1.09     ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09     Y := Y
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 1
% 0.72/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  factor: (28) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[0, 1]: (9) {G1,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2} R(4,0) { ! big_p( X, Y ), ! big_p( 
% 0.72/1.09    skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := skol2
% 0.72/1.09     Y := skol2
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (10) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} F(9) { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (28) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resolution: (29) {G2,W2,D2,L1,V1,M1}  { big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[0]: (10) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} F(9) { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent1[1]: (5) {G1,W5,D2,L2,V2,M1} R(1,0) { big_m( X ), big_p( Y, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09     Y := skol2
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (13) {G3,W2,D2,L1,V1,M1} R(10,5) { big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (29) {G2,W2,D2,L1,V1,M1}  { big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resolution: (30) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V2,M1}  { ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[0]: (10) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} F(9) { ! big_p( skol2, skol2 ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent1[0]: (0) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V3,M2} I { big_p( Z, Z ), ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09     Y := Y
% 0.72/1.09     Z := skol2
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (14) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V2,M1} R(10,0) { ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (30) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V2,M1}  { ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09     Y := Y
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resolution: (31) {G1,W5,D4,L1,V1,M1}  { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[0]: (14) {G3,W3,D2,L1,V2,M1} R(10,0) { ! big_p( X, Y ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent1[1]: (2) {G0,W9,D4,L2,V1,M1} I { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ), big_p
% 0.72/1.09    ( X, skol1( X ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09     Y := skol1( X )
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (15) {G4,W5,D4,L1,V1,M1} R(14,2) { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (31) {G1,W5,D4,L1,V1,M1}  { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resolution: (32) {G1,W6,D5,L1,V1,M1}  { ! big_m( g( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ) )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[1]: (3) {G0,W5,D3,L2,V1,M1} I { ! big_m( g( X ) ), ! big_q( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent1[0]: (15) {G4,W5,D4,L1,V1,M1} R(14,2) { big_q( f( X, skol1( X ) ) )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := f( X, skol1( X ) )
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  resolution: (33) {G2,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0[0]: (32) {G1,W6,D5,L1,V1,M1}  { ! big_m( g( f( X, skol1( X ) ) ) )
% 0.72/1.09     }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent1[0]: (13) {G3,W2,D2,L1,V1,M1} R(10,5) { big_m( X ) }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09     X := X
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.72/1.09     X := g( f( X, skol1( X ) ) )
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsumption: (16) {G5,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(15,3);r(13) {  }.
% 0.72/1.09  parent0: (33) {G2,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.72/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.72/1.09  end
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Proof check complete!
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Memory use:
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  space for terms:        208
% 0.72/1.09  space for clauses:      763
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  clauses generated:      25
% 0.72/1.09  clauses kept:           17
% 0.72/1.09  clauses selected:       10
% 0.72/1.09  clauses deleted:        3
% 0.72/1.09  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  subsentry:          16
% 0.72/1.09  literals s-matched: 11
% 0.72/1.09  literals matched:   11
% 0.72/1.09  full subsumption:   0
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  checksum:           -537176951
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  
% 0.72/1.09  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------