TSTP Solution File: SYN362+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SYN362+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:30:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.75s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   52 (  25   ~;   8   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   2 sgn  24   !;  17   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ? [X2] :
        ! [X3] :
          ( big_p(X3)
         => ~ big_r(X2,X3) )
      & ! [X0] :
        ? [X1] : big_r(X0,X1) )
   => ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x2113) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ? [X2] :
          ! [X3] :
            ( big_p(X3)
           => ~ big_r(X2,X3) )
        & ! [X0] :
          ? [X1] : big_r(X0,X1) )
     => ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ? [X0] :
          ! [X1] :
            ( big_p(X1)
           => ~ big_r(X0,X1) )
        & ! [X2] :
          ? [X3] : big_r(X2,X3) )
     => ? [X4] : ~ big_p(X4) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ! [X4] : big_p(X4)
    & ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( ~ big_r(X0,X1)
        | ~ big_p(X1) )
    & ! [X2] :
      ? [X3] : big_r(X2,X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ! [X4] : big_p(X4)
    & ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( ~ big_r(X0,X1)
        | ~ big_p(X1) )
    & ! [X2] :
      ? [X3] : big_r(X2,X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : big_p(X0)
    & ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( ~ big_r(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_p(X2) )
    & ! [X3] :
      ? [X4] : big_r(X3,X4) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( ~ big_r(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_p(X2) )
   => ! [X2] :
        ( ~ big_r(sK0,X2)
        | ~ big_p(X2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ? [X4] : big_r(X3,X4)
     => big_r(X3,sK1(X3)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : big_p(X0)
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ~ big_r(sK0,X2)
        | ~ big_p(X2) )
    & ! [X3] : big_r(X3,sK1(X3)) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X3] : big_r(X3,sK1(X3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ big_r(sK0,X2)
      | ~ big_p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] : big_p(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    big_p(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_r(sK0,X0)
    | ~ big_p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    big_r(X0,sK1(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_r(sK0,X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_51]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SYN362+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  2 20:50:46 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.75/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.75/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  ------  iProver source info
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.75/1.15  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.75/1.15  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  ------ Parsing...
% 0.75/1.15  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s 
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.75/1.15  
% 0.75/1.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------