TSTP Solution File: SYN359+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN359+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:12:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN359+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 15:14:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Mon Jul 11 15:14:42 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11224.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36 in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 3
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 4
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 75
% 0.13/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 4
% 0.13/0.39 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.13/0.39 distinct function count: 1
% 0.13/0.39 distinct constant count: 1
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 2 [ 1 0 35 ] (0.00 seconds, 49 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.01 sec ----> 7 [hyper,6,3,4] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 1 [] {+} -big_r(A)|big_q(A,$f1(A)).
% 0.13/0.40 2 [] {+} -big_q(A,B)|big_q(A,A).
% 0.13/0.40 3 [] {+} -big_q(A,B)| -big_r(B).
% 0.13/0.40 4 [] {-} big_r($c1).
% 0.13/0.40 5 [hyper,4,1] {+} big_q($c1,$f1($c1)).
% 0.13/0.40 6 [hyper,5,2] {+} big_q($c1,$c1).
% 0.13/0.40 7 [hyper,6,3,4] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.40 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ============ end of search ============
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 true clauses given 1 (33.3%)
% 0.13/0.40 false clauses given 2
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 FALSE TRUE
% 0.13/0.40 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 2 [ 1 0 35 ] (0.00 seconds, 49 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Process 11224 finished Mon Jul 11 15:14:42 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------