TSTP Solution File: SYN355^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN355^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:22:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN355^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:15:22 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 % (31652)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31645)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31647)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31646)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31650)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31651)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31648)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31649)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31645)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 % (31647)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_0, type, cQ: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_1, type, cP: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(func_def_2, type, cR: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 $false),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f18,f11])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true != (cQ @ sK0))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ! [X0] : (((cR @ X0) != $true) | ((cP @ X0) = $true)) & ! [X1] : (($true = (cQ @ X1)) | ((cR @ X1) = $true)) & (($true != (cP @ sK0)) & ($true != (cQ @ sK0)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f8,f9])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ? [X2] : (($true != (cP @ X2)) & ($true != (cQ @ X2))) => (($true != (cP @ sK0)) & ($true != (cQ @ sK0)))),
% 0.14/0.38 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ! [X0] : (((cR @ X0) != $true) | ((cP @ X0) = $true)) & ! [X1] : (($true = (cQ @ X1)) | ((cR @ X1) = $true)) & ? [X2] : (($true != (cP @ X2)) & ($true != (cQ @ X2)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(flattening,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ? [X2] : (($true != (cP @ X2)) & ($true != (cQ @ X2))) & (! [X1] : (($true = (cQ @ X1)) | ((cR @ X1) = $true)) & ! [X0] : (((cR @ X0) != $true) | ((cP @ X0) = $true)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~((! [X1] : (($true != (cQ @ X1)) => ((cR @ X1) = $true)) & ! [X0] : (((cR @ X0) = $true) => ((cP @ X0) = $true))) => ! [X2] : (($true = (cP @ X2)) | ($true = (cQ @ X2))))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(flattening,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~((! [X0] : (((cR @ X0) = $true) => ((cP @ X0) = $true)) & ! [X1] : (~($true = (cQ @ X1)) => ((cR @ X1) = $true))) => ! [X2] : (($true = (cP @ X2)) | ($true = (cQ @ X2))))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~((! [X0] : ((cR @ X0) => (cP @ X0)) & ! [X1] : (~(cQ @ X1) => (cR @ X1))) => ! [X2] : ((cP @ X2) | (cQ @ X2)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.38 ~((! [X0] : ((cR @ X0) => (cP @ X0)) & ! [X0] : (~(cQ @ X0) => (cR @ X0))) => ! [X0] : ((cP @ X0) | (cQ @ X0)))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.38 (! [X0] : ((cR @ X0) => (cP @ X0)) & ! [X0] : (~(cQ @ X0) => (cR @ X0))) => ! [X0] : ((cP @ X0) | (cQ @ X0))),
% 0.14/0.38 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX2106)).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true = (cQ @ sK0))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f17])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true = (cQ @ sK0)) | ($true != $true)),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f12,f16])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cP @ X0) = $true) | ((cQ @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f15])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cQ @ X0) = $true) | ((cP @ X0) = $true) | ($true != $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(superposition,[],[f14,f13])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((cR @ X1) = $true) | ($true = (cQ @ X1))) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cR @ X0) != $true) | ((cP @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.14/0.38 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.14/0.38 ($true != (cP @ sK0))),
% 0.14/0.38 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10])).
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31652)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38 % (31644)Success in time 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------