TSTP Solution File: SYN354+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SYN354+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:30:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.89s 1.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  190 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   30 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  255 (  88   ~;  91   |;  54   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   8 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   1 sgn  28   !;  21   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
    ? [X2,X3] :
    ! [X4] :
      ( big_f(X0,X1)
     => ( big_g(X0,X1)
       => ( ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
            <=> big_g(X3,X4) )
           => ( big_f(X2,X3)
             => big_f(X1,X3) ) )
         => ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
            <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
           => ( big_f(X2,X3)
              & big_f(X1,X2)
              & big_f(X0,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_20_1) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
      ? [X2,X3] :
      ! [X4] :
        ( big_f(X0,X1)
       => ( big_g(X0,X1)
         => ( ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
              <=> big_g(X3,X4) )
             => ( big_f(X2,X3)
               => big_f(X1,X3) ) )
           => ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
              <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
             => ( big_f(X2,X3)
                & big_f(X1,X2)
                & big_f(X0,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
      <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( big_g(X1,X4)
        <~> big_g(X3,X4) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
      <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( big_g(X1,X4)
        <~> big_g(X3,X4) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_g(X2,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X3,X4)
            | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_g(X2,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X3,X4)
            | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
      ! [X2,X3] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(X1,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
        & ( big_g(X2,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
        & ( big_f(X1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
              | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
            & ( big_g(X3,X4)
              | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
        & big_g(X0,X1)
        & big_f(X0,X1) )
   => ! [X3,X2] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(sK1,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
        & ( big_g(X2,X4)
          | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
        & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
              | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
            & ( big_g(X3,X4)
              | big_g(sK1,X4) ) ) )
        & big_g(sK0,sK1)
        & big_f(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
            | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
            | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
          & ( big_g(sK1,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X2,X4)
            | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
          & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
            | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
            | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
                | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
              & ( big_g(X3,X4)
                | big_g(sK1,X4) ) ) )
          & big_g(sK0,sK1)
          & big_f(sK0,sK1) )
     => ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
          | ~ big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3)) )
        & ( big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
          | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
        & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
              | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
            & ( big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
              | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ) ) )
        & big_g(sK0,sK1)
        & big_f(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
        | ~ big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
        | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
            | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
          & ( big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
            | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ) ) )
      & big_g(sK0,sK1)
      & big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( big_f(sK1,X3)
      | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( big_f(sK1,X3)
      | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(X0,X1)
    | ~ big_f(sK1,X0)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_g(X0,sK2(X1,X0))
    | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X1,X0))
    | ~ big_f(X1,X0)
    | big_f(sK1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(X0,X1)
    | big_g(X1,sK2(X0,X1))
    | big_g(sK1,sK2(X0,X1))
    | big_f(sK1,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_165,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(X0,X1)
    | big_g(X1,sK2(X0,X1))
    | big_g(sK1,sK2(X0,X1))
    | big_f(sK1,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

cnf(c_166,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_g(X0,sK2(X1,X0))
    | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X1,X0))
    | ~ big_f(X1,X0)
    | big_f(sK1,X0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_170,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
    | big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1))
    | big_f(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_165]) ).

cnf(c_171,plain,
    ( ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
    | big_f(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_166]) ).

cnf(c_172,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_171,c_170,c_56,c_55]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN354+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:22:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.89/1.20  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------  iProver source info
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.89/1.20  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.89/1.20  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Parsing...
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Proving...
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  clauses                                 6
% 1.89/1.20  conjectures                             6
% 1.89/1.20  EPR                                     2
% 1.89/1.20  Horn                                    5
% 1.89/1.20  unary                                   1
% 1.89/1.20  binary                                  2
% 1.89/1.20  lits                                    16
% 1.89/1.20  lits eq                                 0
% 1.89/1.20  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.89/1.20  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.89/1.20  fd_cond                                 0
% 1.89/1.20  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 1.89/1.20  AC symbols                              0
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ 
% 1.89/1.20  Current options:
% 1.89/1.20  ------ 
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  ------ Proving...
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.89/1.20  
% 1.89/1.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------