TSTP Solution File: SYN354+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN354+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:21:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.68s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  180 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   30 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  242 (  84   ~;  82   |;  54   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   8 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (  34   !;  21   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f30,f10]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
        | ~ big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
        | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
            | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
          & ( big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
            | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ) ) )
      & big_g(sK0,sK1)
      & big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
      ! [X2,X3] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(X1,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
        & ( big_g(X2,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
        & ( big_f(X1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
              | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
            & ( big_g(X3,X4)
              | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
        & big_g(X0,X1)
        & big_f(X0,X1) )
   => ! [X3,X2] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(sK1,X4)
          | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
        & ( big_g(X2,X4)
          | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
        & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
              | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
            & ( big_g(X3,X4)
              | big_g(sK1,X4) ) ) )
        & big_g(sK0,sK1)
        & big_f(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
            | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
            | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
          & ( big_g(sK1,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X2,X4)
            | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
          & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
            | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
            | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
                | ~ big_g(sK1,X4) )
              & ( big_g(X3,X4)
                | big_g(sK1,X4) ) ) )
          & big_g(sK0,sK1)
          & big_f(sK0,sK1) )
     => ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
          | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) )
        & ( big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
          | ~ big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3)) )
        & ( big_g(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
          | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
        & ( big_f(sK1,X3)
          | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
          | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
              | ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
            & ( big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
              | big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ) ) )
        & big_g(sK0,sK1)
        & big_f(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_g(X2,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X3,X4)
            | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_g(X2,X4)
        | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_g(X3,X4)
            | ~ big_g(X1,X4) )
          & ( big_g(X3,X4)
            | big_g(X1,X4) ) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
      <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( big_g(X1,X4)
        <~> big_g(X3,X4) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
        | ~ big_f(X0,X2) )
      & ( big_g(X1,X4)
      <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
      & ( big_f(X1,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
        | ( big_g(X1,X4)
        <~> big_g(X3,X4) ) )
      & big_g(X0,X1)
      & big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
      ? [X2,X3] :
      ! [X4] :
        ( big_f(X0,X1)
       => ( big_g(X0,X1)
         => ( ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
              <=> big_g(X3,X4) )
             => ( big_f(X2,X3)
               => big_f(X1,X3) ) )
           => ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
              <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
             => ( big_f(X2,X3)
                & big_f(X1,X2)
                & big_f(X0,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
    ? [X2,X3] :
    ! [X4] :
      ( big_f(X0,X1)
     => ( big_g(X0,X1)
       => ( ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
            <=> big_g(X3,X4) )
           => ( big_f(X2,X3)
             => big_f(X1,X3) ) )
         => ( ( big_g(X1,X4)
            <=> big_g(X2,X4) )
           => ( big_f(X2,X3)
              & big_f(X1,X2)
              & big_f(X0,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_20_1) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ big_f(X0,sK1),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X0,sK1))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f22,f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ~ big_f(sK1,sK1),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f17,f10]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(factoring,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK1,X2)
      | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X0,sK1))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK1)
      | big_f(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(factoring,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | ~ big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(sK1,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ big_f(X0,sK1)
      | big_g(sK1,sK2(X0,sK1)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f18]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ big_f(X0,sK1)
      | big_g(sK1,sK2(X0,sK1))
      | big_f(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ big_f(X0,sK1)
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK1)
      | big_g(sK1,sK2(X0,sK1))
      | big_f(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f24,f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( big_g(sK1,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_f(X2,X3)
      | big_g(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(sK1,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SYN354+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 15:43:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.13/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.68/0.86  % (12853)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.68/0.86  % (12850)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.68/0.86  % (12856)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.68/0.86  % (12852)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.68/0.86  % (12854)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.68/0.86  % (12855)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.68/0.86  % (12851)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.68/0.86  % (12857)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.68/0.87  % (12851)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12854)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)First to succeed.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12852)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12856)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12855)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12853)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12857)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-12848"
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.68/0.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.68/0.87  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)------------------------------
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)Memory used [KB]: 990
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.68/0.87  % (12850)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.68/0.87  % (12848)Success in time 0.515 s
% 0.68/0.87  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------