TSTP Solution File: SYN349-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SYN349-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:01:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 11 unt; 7 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 55 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause1,negated_conjecture,
( f(X,g(X,Y))
| ~ f(w(X),g(X,Y)) ) ).
cnf(clause2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X,g(X,Y))
| f(w(X),g(X,Y)) ) ).
cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X,g(X,Y))
| f(g(X,Y),Y)
| ~ f(Y,g(X,Y))
| f(g(X,Y),w(X)) ) ).
cnf(clause5,negated_conjecture,
( f(X,g(X,Y))
| f(g(X,Y),Y)
| f(Y,g(X,Y))
| f(g(X,Y),w(X)) ) ).
cnf(clause8,negated_conjecture,
( f(X,g(X,Y))
| ~ f(g(X,Y),Y)
| f(Y,g(X,Y))
| ~ f(g(X,Y),w(X)) ) ).
cnf(clause10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X,g(X,Y))
| ~ f(g(X,Y),Y)
| ~ f(Y,g(X,Y))
| ~ f(g(X,Y),w(X)) ) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( ~ f(X_15,g(X_15,w(X_15)))
| ~ f(g(X_15,w(X_15)),w(X_15))
| ~ f(w(X_15),g(X_15,w(X_15))) ),
inference(subst,[],[clause10:[bind(X,$fot(X_15)),bind(Y,$fot(w(X_15)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ f(X_9,g(X_9,w(X_9)))
| f(w(X_9),g(X_9,w(X_9))) ),
inference(subst,[],[clause2:[bind(X,$fot(X_9)),bind(Y,$fot(w(X_9)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( ~ f(w(X_8),g(X_8,w(X_8)))
| f(X_8,g(X_8,w(X_8))) ),
inference(subst,[],[clause1:[bind(X,$fot(X_8)),bind(Y,$fot(w(X_8)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ f(g(X_7,w(X_7)),w(X_7))
| f(X_7,g(X_7,w(X_7)))
| f(w(X_7),g(X_7,w(X_7))) ),
inference(subst,[],[clause8:[bind(X,$fot(X_7)),bind(Y,$fot(w(X_7)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( f(X_7,g(X_7,w(X_7)))
| f(g(X_7,w(X_7)),w(X_7))
| f(w(X_7),g(X_7,w(X_7))) ),
inference(subst,[],[clause5:[bind(X,$fot(X_7)),bind(Y,$fot(w(X_7)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( f(X_7,g(X_7,w(X_7)))
| f(w(X_7),g(X_7,w(X_7))) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(g(X_7,w(X_7)),w(X_7)) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( f(X_8,g(X_8,w(X_8)))
| f(w(X_8),g(X_8,w(X_8))) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_7,$fot(X_8))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
f(X_8,g(X_8,w(X_8))),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(w(X_8),g(X_8,w(X_8))) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_2]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
f(X_9,g(X_9,w(X_9))),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X_8,$fot(X_9))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
f(w(X_9),g(X_9,w(X_9))),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(X_9,g(X_9,w(X_9))) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
f(w(X_13),g(X_13,w(X_13))),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_9,$fot(X_13))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
( ~ f(X_13,g(X_13,w(X_13)))
| ~ f(w(X_13),g(X_13,w(X_13)))
| f(g(X_13,w(X_13)),w(X_13)) ),
inference(subst,[],[clause3:[bind(X,$fot(X_13)),bind(Y,$fot(w(X_13)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
( ~ f(X_13,g(X_13,w(X_13)))
| f(g(X_13,w(X_13)),w(X_13)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(w(X_13),g(X_13,w(X_13))) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_11]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
f(X_13,g(X_13,w(X_13))),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X_8,$fot(X_13))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
f(g(X_13,w(X_13)),w(X_13)),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(X_13,g(X_13,w(X_13))) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_12]) ).
cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
f(g(X_15,w(X_15)),w(X_15)),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_14:[bind(X_13,$fot(X_15))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
( ~ f(X_15,g(X_15,w(X_15)))
| ~ f(w(X_15),g(X_15,w(X_15))) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(g(X_15,w(X_15)),w(X_15)) )],[refute_0_15,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
f(X_15,g(X_15,w(X_15))),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X_8,$fot(X_15))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
~ f(w(X_15),g(X_15,w(X_15))),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(X_15,g(X_15,w(X_15))) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_16]) ).
cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
f(w(X_15),g(X_15,w(X_15))),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_9,$fot(X_15))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(w(X_15),g(X_15,w(X_15))) )],[refute_0_19,refute_0_18]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYN349-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 12:59:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------