%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SYN349-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 unknown
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1000MB
% OS       : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN349-1+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: nne
% detected subclass: small
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 27 #f 2 7)
% (binary-unit 10 #f 2 7)
% (binary-double 16 #f)
% (binary 16 #t 2 7)
% (binary-posweight-order 181 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 54 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 54 #f)
% (binary-order 27 #f 2 7)
% (binary-weightorder 71 #f)
% (binary-order 27 #f)
% (hyper-order 54 #f)
% (binary 63 #t)
% 
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(10,40,1,20,0,1,37,50,1,47,0,1)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 39 [] -f(g(X,Y),w(X)) | -f(g(X,Y),Y) | f(Y,g(X,Y)) | f(X,g(X,Y)).
% 42 [] f(g(X,Y),w(X)) | f(Y,g(X,Y)) | f(X,g(X,Y)) | f(g(X,Y),Y).
% 44 [] f(g(X,Y),w(X)) | -f(Y,g(X,Y)) | -f(X,g(X,Y)) | f(g(X,Y),Y).
% 45 [] f(w(X),g(X,Y)) | -f(X,g(X,Y)).
% 46 [] -f(w(X),g(X,Y)) | f(X,g(X,Y)).
% 47 [] -f(g(X,Y),w(X)) | -f(Y,g(X,Y)) | -f(X,g(X,Y)) | -f(g(X,Y),Y).
% 49 [input:42,factor:binarycut:46] f(g(X,w(X)),w(X)) | f(X,g(X,w(X))).
% 59 [hyper:39,49,binarycut:49,binarycut:46] f(X,g(X,w(X))).
% 62 [hyper:45,59] f(w(X),g(X,w(X))).
% 65 [hyper:44,62,49] f(g(X,w(X)),w(X)).
% 66 [hyper:46,62] f(X,g(X,w(X))).
% 68 [hyper:47,66,cut:62,cut:65,cut:65] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 7
% clause depth limited to 3
% seconds given: 27
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    20
%  derived clauses:   214
%  kept clauses:      10
%  kept size sum:     125
%  kept mid-nuclei:   6
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    3
%  forw double-subs: 20
%  forw overdouble-subs: 3
%  backward subs:     3
%  fast unit cutoff:  1
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  3
%  real runtime:  0.0
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           35
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  9
%  predlist fails:  12
%  aux str. fails:  2
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 12
%  full subs fail:  9
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN349-1+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------