TSTP Solution File: SYN349+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:12:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:10:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Mon Jul 11 20:10:29 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 23223.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 18
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 3
% 0.12/0.38     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.12/0.38     distinct function count: 2
% 0.12/0.38     distinct constant count: 0
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.06 sec ----> 27 [hyper,25,15,24,23] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  1 [] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,B))|big_f($f2(A),$f1(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.45  2 [] {+} big_f(A,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($f2(A),$f1(A,B)).
% 0.19/0.45  4 [] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,B))|big_f($f1(A,B),B)| -big_f(B,$f1(A,B))|big_f($f1(A,B),$f2(A)).
% 0.19/0.45  7 [] {+} big_f(A,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($f1(A,B),B)|big_f(B,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($f1(A,B),$f2(A)).
% 0.19/0.45  9 [] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($f1(A,B),B)| -big_f(B,$f1(A,B))| -big_f($f1(A,B),$f2(A)).
% 0.19/0.45  11 [factor,4.2.4] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,$f2(A)))|big_f($f1(A,$f2(A)),$f2(A))| -big_f($f2(A),$f1(A,$f2(A))).
% 0.19/0.45  13 [factor,7.2.4] {+} big_f(A,$f1(A,$f2(A)))| -big_f($f1(A,$f2(A)),$f2(A))|big_f($f2(A),$f1(A,$f2(A))).
% 0.19/0.45  15 [factor,9.2.4] {+} -big_f(A,$f1(A,$f2(A)))| -big_f($f1(A,$f2(A)),$f2(A))| -big_f($f2(A),$f1(A,$f2(A))).
% 0.19/0.45  16 [] {-} big_f(A,$f1(A,B))|big_f($f1(A,B),B)|big_f(B,$f1(A,B))|big_f($f1(A,B),$f2(A)).
% 0.19/0.45  20 [hyper,16,2,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} big_f(A,$f1(A,$f2(A)))|big_f($f1(A,$f2(A)),$f2(A)).
% 0.19/0.45  22 [hyper,20,13,factor_simp] {-} big_f(A,$f1(A,$f2(A)))|big_f($f2(A),$f1(A,$f2(A))).
% 0.19/0.45  23 [hyper,22,1,factor_simp] {-} big_f($f2(A),$f1(A,$f2(A))).
% 0.19/0.45  24 [hyper,22,2,factor_simp] {-} big_f(A,$f1(A,$f2(A))).
% 0.19/0.45  25 [hyper,23,11,24] {-} big_f($f1(A,$f2(A)),$f2(A)).
% 0.19/0.45  27 [hyper,25,15,24,23] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.45  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 0.19/0.45  false clauses given          7
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.45    11  1         0
% 0.19/0.45    22  1         0
% 0.19/0.45  tot:  2         0      (0.0% true)
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Process 23223 finished Mon Jul 11 20:10:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------