TSTP Solution File: SYN346-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN346-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:45:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN346-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:45:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.61 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.65 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.65 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.65 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.65 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.65 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 % File : SYN346-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.19/0.65 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.65 % Problem : Church problem 46.17 (2)
% 0.19/0.65 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.65 % English :
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Refs : [Chu56] Church (1956), Introduction to Mathematical Logic I
% 0.19/0.65 % : [FL+93] Fermuller et al. (1993), Resolution Methods for the De
% 0.19/0.65 % : [Tam94] Tammet (1994), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe.
% 0.19/0.65 % Source : [Tam94]
% 0.19/0.65 % Names : Ch17N2 [Tam94]
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.65 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.19/0.65 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of variables : 8 ( 3 sgn)
% 0.19/0.65 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.19/0.66
% 0.19/0.66 % Comments : All the problems here can be decided by using a certain
% 0.19/0.66 % completeness-preserving term ordering strategies. See [FL+93].
% 0.19/0.66 % : The conversion from the full 1st order form in [Chu56]
% 0.19/0.66 % to clause form was done by hand by Tanel Tammet.
% 0.19/0.66 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(clause1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.66 f(b,z1(Y1,Y2)) ).
% 0.19/0.66
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(clause2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.66 f(Y1,z2(Y1,Y2)) ).
% 0.19/0.66
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.66 ( ~ f(Y1,z1(Y1,Y2))
% 0.19/0.66 | ~ f(Y2,z1(Y1,Y2)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.66
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(clause4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.66 ( ~ f(b,z2(Y1,Y2))
% 0.19/0.66 | ~ f(Y2,z2(Y1,Y2)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.66
% 0.19/0.66 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.66 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.66 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.66 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.66 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.66 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.66 %VarNum:16(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 0.19/0.66 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.19/0.66 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.66 %SharedTerms:1
% 0.19/0.66 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4
% 0.19/0.66 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.66 [1]P1(a1,f2(x11,x12))
% 0.19/0.66 [2]P1(x21,f3(x21,x22))
% 0.19/0.66 [3]~P1(x31,f3(x32,x31))+~P1(a1,f3(x32,x31))
% 0.19/0.66 [4]~P1(x41,f2(x42,x41))+~P1(x42,f2(x42,x41))
% 0.19/0.66 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.66
% 0.19/0.66 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(5,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 ($false),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3]),
% 0.19/0.66 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.66 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.66 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------