TSTP Solution File: SYN296-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYN296-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:57:46 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.64s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_092,axiom,
    ( q1(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ n0(X3,X2)
    | ~ p0(X4,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_092) ).

cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(e,b,e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(axiom_15,axiom,
    n0(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_15) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( q1(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ n0(X3,X2)
    | ~ p0(X4,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_092]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( q1(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ n0(X3,X2)
    | ~ p0(X4,X1) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    p0(b,X1),
    axiom_14 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(e,b,e),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( q1(X1,X2,X1)
    | ~ n0(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    n0(a,b),
    axiom_15 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(e,b,e),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    q1(X1,b,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SYN296-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 13:43:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/0.55  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.64/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # new_bool_3 with pid 23819 completed with status 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.64/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.64/0.55  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.55  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 23823 completed with status 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.64/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.64/0.55  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.55  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.64/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.64/0.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.64/0.55  
% 0.64/0.55  # Proof found!
% 0.64/0.55  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.64/0.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.64/0.55  # Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.64/0.55  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 160
% 0.64/0.55  # Initial clauses                      : 209
% 0.64/0.55  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.64/0.55  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 204
% 0.64/0.55  # Processed clauses                    : 531
% 0.64/0.55  # ...of these trivial                  : 25
% 0.64/0.55  # ...subsumed                          : 21
% 0.64/0.55  # ...remaining for further processing  : 485
% 0.64/0.55  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 0.64/0.55  # Backward-rewritten                   : 85
% 0.64/0.55  # Generated clauses                    : 684
% 0.64/0.55  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 399
% 0.64/0.55  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.64/0.55  # Paramodulations                      : 684
% 0.64/0.55  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Total rewrite steps                  : 552
% 0.64/0.55  # ...of those cached                   : 415
% 0.64/0.55  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.64/0.55  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.64/0.55  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.64/0.55  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.64/0.55  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.64/0.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 209
% 0.64/0.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 105
% 0.64/0.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.64/0.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 104
% 0.64/0.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 211
% 0.64/0.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 476
% 0.64/0.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 276
% 0.64/0.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12620
% 0.64/0.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9098
% 0.64/0.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 32
% 0.64/0.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 597
% 0.64/0.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 194
% 0.64/0.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 53
% 0.64/0.55  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.64/0.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 15581
% 0.64/0.55  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1643
% 0.64/0.55  
% 0.64/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.55  # User time                : 0.035 s
% 0.64/0.55  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.64/0.55  # Total time               : 0.043 s
% 0.64/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 2372 pages
% 0.64/0.55  
% 0.64/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.55  # User time                : 0.041 s
% 0.64/0.55  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.64/0.55  # Total time               : 0.052 s
% 0.64/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.64/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------