TSTP Solution File: SYN294-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN294-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:06:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 48 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',rule_001) ).
cnf(rule_034,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',rule_034) ).
cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
n0(b,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',axiom_37) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',axiom_17) ).
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
n0(d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',axiom_26) ).
cnf(rule_113,axiom,
( q1(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r0(X3)
| ~ m1(X1,X2,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',rule_113) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(d,d,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
r0(e),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p',axiom_13) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_001]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_034]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( k1(X1)
| ~ n0(X2,X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
n0(b,a),
axiom_37 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
k1(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( m1(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ k1(X2)
| ~ q0(X1,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
n0(d,c),
axiom_26 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( q1(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r0(X3)
| ~ m1(X1,X2,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_113]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( m1(d,X1,X1)
| ~ k1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
k1(c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(d,d,c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( q1(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r0(X3)
| ~ m1(X1,X2,X2) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
m1(d,c,c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ q1(d,d,c),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
r0(e),
axiom_13 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ r0(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14 % Problem : SYN294-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:51:33 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K8qMMqaSMq/E---3.1_7046.p
% 0.56/0.58 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.56/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # new_bool_3 with pid 7126 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.56/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.58 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.58 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 7129 completed with status 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.56/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.56/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.56/0.58 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.56/0.58 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.56/0.58 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.56/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.56/0.58
% 0.56/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.56/0.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.56/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.56/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.56/0.58 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.56/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.56/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.56/0.58 # Processed clauses : 437
% 0.56/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 24
% 0.56/0.58 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.56/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 398
% 0.56/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 15
% 0.56/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 29
% 0.56/0.58 # Generated clauses : 352
% 0.56/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 223
% 0.56/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.56/0.58 # Paramodulations : 350
% 0.56/0.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 284
% 0.56/0.58 # ...of those cached : 202
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.56/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 175
% 0.56/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 84
% 0.56/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.56/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 88
% 0.56/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 163
% 0.56/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 361
% 0.56/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 223
% 0.56/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9170
% 0.56/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6926
% 0.56/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.56/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 123
% 0.56/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 88
% 0.56/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 25
% 0.56/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.56/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11771
% 0.56/0.58 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1642
% 0.56/0.58
% 0.56/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.58 # User time : 0.028 s
% 0.56/0.58 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.56/0.58 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.56/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2376 pages
% 0.56/0.58
% 0.56/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.58 # User time : 0.035 s
% 0.56/0.58 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.56/0.58 # Total time : 0.041 s
% 0.56/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2016 pages
% 0.56/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.56/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------