TSTP Solution File: SYN290-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYN290-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:44:03 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_093,axiom,
    ( q1(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_093) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(c,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(axiom_33,axiom,
    q0(d,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_33) ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( q1(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_093]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(c,X1,X2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( q1(X1,X1,X1)
    | ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    q0(d,c),
    axiom_33 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q1(c,X1,X2),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13  % Problem    : SYN290-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.09/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 14:24:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.52  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # new_bool_1 with pid 25647 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25650 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52  # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 369
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 160
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses                      : 209
% 0.21/0.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.21/0.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 204
% 0.21/0.52  # Processed clauses                    : 294
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 12
% 0.21/0.52  # ...subsumed                          : 16
% 0.21/0.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 266
% 0.21/0.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.21/0.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.21/0.52  # Generated clauses                    : 64
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 50
% 0.21/0.52  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.21/0.52  # Paramodulations                      : 64
% 0.21/0.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Total rewrite steps                  : 77
% 0.21/0.52  # ...of those cached                   : 41
% 0.21/0.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 83
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 57
% 0.21/0.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.21/0.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 24
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 137
% 0.21/0.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 358
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 183
% 0.21/0.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6511
% 0.21/0.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4716
% 0.21/0.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
% 0.21/0.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.21/0.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.21/0.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8648
% 0.21/0.52  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1643
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 2368 pages
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.21/0.52  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.21/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.21/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------