TSTP Solution File: SYN260-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN260-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:06:47 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_067,axiom,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JzW33XjB5e/E---3.1_14170.p',rule_067) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(X1,d,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JzW33XjB5e/E---3.1_14170.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JzW33XjB5e/E---3.1_14170.p',axiom_17) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_067]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(X1,d,d),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ p1(X1,d,d),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.15 % Problem : SYN260-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.08/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:45:03 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JzW33XjB5e/E---3.1_14170.p
% 0.23/0.59 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # new_bool_3 with pid 14257 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.59 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 14261 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.59 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.23/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.23/0.59 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.23/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.23/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.23/0.59 # Processed clauses : 284
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.23/0.59 # ...subsumed : 14
% 0.23/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 261
% 0.23/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.23/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.23/0.59 # Generated clauses : 45
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.23/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.23/0.59 # Paramodulations : 45
% 0.23/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 77
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of those cached : 38
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 75
% 0.23/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 56
% 0.23/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 127
% 0.23/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 354
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 186
% 0.23/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6367
% 0.23/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4644
% 0.23/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.23/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.23/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.23/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.23/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8490
% 0.23/0.59 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1643
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.59 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/0.59 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2376 pages
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.59 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.23/0.59 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2016 pages
% 0.23/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------