TSTP Solution File: SYN256-1 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10
% Problem  : SYN256-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  7 11:01:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 231.35s 41.60s
% Output   : Refutation 231.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  16 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  202 (  36   ~;  33   |;   0   &; 133   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0   ^  47   !;   0   ?;  47   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(n2_type,type,
    n2: $i > $o ).

thf(c_type,type,
    c: $i ).

thf(a_type,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(r0_type,type,
    r0: $i > $o ).

thf(p0_type,type,
    p0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(l0_type,type,
    l0: $i > $o ).

thf(p1_type,type,
    p1: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(b_type,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(s0_type,type,
    s0: $i > $o ).

thf(182,axiom,
    l0 @ a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_20) ).

thf(715,plain,
    l0 @ a,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[182]) ).

thf(353,axiom,
    p0 @ c @ b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_18) ).

thf(1039,plain,
    p0 @ c @ b,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[353]) ).

thf(193,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( p0 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( r0 @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_074) ).

thf(735,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( p0 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( r0 @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[193]) ).

thf(736,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( p0 @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( r0 @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[735]) ).

thf(18589,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ A @ B )
      | ~ ( r0 @ A )
      | ( ( p0 @ c @ b )
       != ( p0 @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[1039,736]) ).

thf(18590,plain,
    ( ( p1 @ b @ b @ c )
    | ~ ( r0 @ b ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[18589:[bind(A,$thf( b )),bind(B,$thf( c ))]]) ).

thf(43,axiom,
    r0 @ b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).

thf(450,plain,
    r0 @ b,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[43]) ).

thf(19143,plain,
    ( ( p1 @ b @ b @ c )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[18590,450]) ).

thf(19144,plain,
    p1 @ b @ b @ c,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[19143]) ).

thf(116,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( l0 @ C )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ D @ A )
      | ~ ( s0 @ b ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_071) ).

thf(587,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( l0 @ C )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ D @ A )
      | ~ ( s0 @ b ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[116]) ).

thf(588,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( l0 @ C )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ D @ A )
      | ~ ( s0 @ b ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[587]) ).

thf(75,axiom,
    s0 @ b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

thf(511,plain,
    s0 @ b,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

thf(9176,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( l0 @ C )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ D @ A )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[588,511]) ).

thf(9177,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( l0 @ C )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ D @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9176]) ).

thf(19154,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ A @ B @ A )
      | ~ ( l0 @ C )
      | ( ( p1 @ b @ b @ c )
       != ( p1 @ B @ D @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[19144,9177]) ).

thf(19155,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ c @ b @ c )
      | ~ ( l0 @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[19154:[bind(A,$thf( c )),bind(B,$thf( b )),bind(C,$thf( C )),bind(D,$thf( b ))]]) ).

thf(19188,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ c @ b @ c )
      | ~ ( l0 @ A ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[19155]) ).

thf(26381,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( p1 @ c @ b @ c )
      | ( ( l0 @ a )
       != ( l0 @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[715,19188]) ).

thf(26382,plain,
    p1 @ c @ b @ c,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[26381:[bind(A,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(322,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( n2 @ A )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_137) ).

thf(979,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( n2 @ A )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[322]) ).

thf(980,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( n2 @ A )
      | ~ ( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[979]) ).

thf(36756,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( n2 @ A )
      | ( ( p1 @ c @ b @ c )
       != ( p1 @ B @ C @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[26382,980]) ).

thf(36757,plain,
    n2 @ c,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[36756:[bind(A,$thf( c )),bind(B,$thf( c )),bind(C,$thf( b ))]]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( n2 @ c ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(370,plain,
    ~ ( n2 @ c ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(371,plain,
    ~ ( n2 @ c ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[370]) ).

thf(36859,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[36757,371]) ).

thf(36860,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[36859]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SYN256-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Mon May  6 21:04:54 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.84/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.40/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (184ms). 
% 1.40/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.06/1.20  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 2.06/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.32/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 368 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.75/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 368 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.93/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 3.17/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.17/1.52  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 231.14/41.59  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 231.35/41.60  % Time passed: 41150ms (effective reasoning time: 40601ms)
% 231.35/41.60  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 231.35/41.60  % Axioms used in derivation (7): rule_071, rule_074, axiom_5, axiom_18, axiom_9, axiom_20, rule_137
% 231.35/41.60  % No. of inferences in proof: 35
% 231.35/41.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 41150 ms resp. 40601 ms w/o parsing
% 231.35/41.62  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 231.35/41.62  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------