TSTP Solution File: SYN250-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SYN250-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:00:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 34 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 65 ( 0 equ; 34 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_6,axiom,
q0(b,b) ).
cnf(axiom_12,axiom,
m0(a,X,a) ).
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
r0(e) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
q0(b,e) ).
cnf(axiom_24,axiom,
l0(c) ).
cnf(axiom_37,axiom,
n0(b,a) ).
cnf(rule_001,axiom,
( k1(I)
| ~ n0(J,I) ) ).
cnf(rule_016,axiom,
( m1(H,I,I)
| ~ m1(J,I,H)
| ~ m1(J,A,I) ) ).
cnf(rule_024,axiom,
( m1(F,a,G)
| ~ m0(a,H,a)
| ~ q0(F,G)
| ~ m1(G,c,G) ) ).
cnf(rule_034,axiom,
( m1(A,B,B)
| ~ k1(a)
| ~ k1(B)
| ~ q0(A,A) ) ).
cnf(rule_035,axiom,
( m1(I,J,I)
| ~ r0(I)
| ~ l0(J) ) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ m1(e,a,a) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( ~ n0(b,a)
| k1(a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_001:[bind(I,$fot(a)),bind(J,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
k1(a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(b,a) )],[axiom_37,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( ~ k1(B)
| ~ q0(A,A)
| m1(A,B,B) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( k1(a) )],[refute_0_1,rule_034]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( ~ k1(X_331)
| ~ q0(b,b)
| m1(b,X_331,X_331) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_2:[bind(A,$fot(b)),bind(B,$fot(X_331))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ k1(X_331)
| m1(b,X_331,X_331) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( q0(b,b) )],[axiom_6,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ k1(a)
| m1(b,a,a) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X_331,$fot(a))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
m1(b,a,a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( k1(a) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_5]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
( ~ l0(X_176)
| ~ r0(e)
| m1(e,X_176,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_035:[bind(I,$fot(e)),bind(J,$fot(X_176))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( ~ l0(X_176)
| m1(e,X_176,e) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( r0(e) )],[axiom_13,refute_0_7]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
( ~ l0(c)
| m1(e,c,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_8:[bind(X_176,$fot(c))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
m1(e,c,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( l0(c) )],[axiom_24,refute_0_9]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
m0(a,H,a),
inference(subst,[],[axiom_12:[bind(X,$fot(H))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
( ~ m1(G,c,G)
| ~ q0(F,G)
| m1(F,a,G) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m0(a,H,a) )],[refute_0_11,rule_024]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
( ~ m1(e,c,e)
| ~ q0(X_259,e)
| m1(X_259,a,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_12:[bind(F,$fot(X_259)),bind(G,$fot(e))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
( ~ q0(X_259,e)
| m1(X_259,a,e) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(e,c,e) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_13]) ).
cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
( ~ q0(b,e)
| m1(b,a,e) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_14:[bind(X_259,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
m1(b,a,e),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( q0(b,e) )],[axiom_21,refute_0_15]) ).
cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
( ~ m1(b,X_440,a)
| ~ m1(b,a,e)
| m1(e,a,a) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_016:[bind(A,$fot(X_440)),bind(H,$fot(e)),bind(I,$fot(a)),bind(J,$fot(b))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
( ~ m1(b,X_440,a)
| m1(e,a,a) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(b,a,e) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_17]) ).
cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
~ m1(b,X_440,a),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(e,a,a) )],[refute_0_18,prove_this]) ).
cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
~ m1(b,a,a),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_19:[bind(X_440,$fot(a))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( m1(b,a,a) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_20]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN250-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 05:41:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.50
% 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------