TSTP Solution File: SYN238-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN238-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:57:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_032,axiom,
( m1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ s0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_032) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ m1(X1,b,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
s0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( m1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ s0(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_032]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ m1(X1,b,X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( m1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ s0(X1) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
s0(b),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ m1(X1,b,X2),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN238-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:41:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # new_bool_1 with pid 1557 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1559 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.54 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.20/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 160
% 0.20/0.54 # Initial clauses : 209
% 0.20/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.20/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 204
% 0.20/0.54 # Processed clauses : 250
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 13
% 0.20/0.54 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.20/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 222
% 0.20/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.20/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.20/0.54 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.20/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.20/0.54 # Paramodulations : 18
% 0.20/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 64
% 0.20/0.54 # ...of those cached : 32
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 40
% 0.20/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 34
% 0.20/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 148
% 0.20/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 388
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 182
% 0.20/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6456
% 0.20/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4662
% 0.20/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 18
% 0.20/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.20/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.20/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.20/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8229
% 0.20/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1643
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.54 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2368 pages
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.54 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.20/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.20/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------