TSTP Solution File: SYN218-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN218-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:19:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 45 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 21 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_126,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p',rule_126) ).
cnf(rule_125,axiom,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p',rule_125) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p',axiom_17) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p',axiom_14) ).
cnf(rule_133,axiom,
( l2(X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ m0(X4,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p',rule_133) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ l2(c,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_27,axiom,
m0(e,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p',axiom_27) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_126]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_125]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ q0(X1,X2)
| ~ s1(X3) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( l2(X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ m0(X4,X3,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_133]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( s1(X1)
| ~ s1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
s1(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( l2(X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| ~ s1(X3)
| ~ m0(X4,X3,X1) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s1(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ l2(c,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( l2(X1,X1)
| ~ p0(X2,X2)
| ~ m0(X3,X4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
m0(e,b,c),
axiom_27 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ l2(c,X1),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
~ p0(X1,X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN218-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:29:49 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.52 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sCJxinUHA4/E---3.1_755.p
% 0.21/0.58 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # new_bool_3 with pid 903 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.58 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.58 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 906 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.58 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.58 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.58 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.58
% 0.21/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.21/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55
% 0.21/0.58 # Initial clauses : 314
% 0.21/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.21/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 309
% 0.21/0.58 # Processed clauses : 647
% 0.21/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 33
% 0.21/0.58 # ...subsumed : 24
% 0.21/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 590
% 0.21/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 14
% 0.21/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 89
% 0.21/0.58 # Generated clauses : 450
% 0.21/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 299
% 0.21/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.21/0.58 # Paramodulations : 450
% 0.21/0.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 413
% 0.21/0.58 # ...of those cached : 274
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 213
% 0.21/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 94
% 0.21/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 117
% 0.21/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 226
% 0.21/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 560
% 0.21/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 377
% 0.21/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22523
% 0.21/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16100
% 0.21/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.21/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 438
% 0.21/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 125
% 0.21/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 65
% 0.21/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 15954
% 0.21/0.58 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1533
% 0.21/0.58
% 0.21/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58 # User time : 0.046 s
% 0.21/0.58 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.58 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.21/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2588 pages
% 0.21/0.58
% 0.21/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58 # User time : 0.053 s
% 0.21/0.58 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.58 # Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.21/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 2016 pages
% 0.21/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------