TSTP Solution File: SYN211-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SYN211-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:29:40 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.45s 1.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (   7 unt;   1 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   53 (   0 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  13 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s4(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    r0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_9) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    p0(b,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_10) ).

cnf(c_68,plain,
    m0(X0,d,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_19) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    k0(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_32) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | ~ r0(X3)
    | l1(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_003) ).

cnf(c_155,plain,
    ( ~ k0(X0)
    | p1(X0,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_068) ).

cnf(c_200,plain,
    ( ~ m1(X0,X1,X1)
    | ~ r0(X2)
    | q1(X0,X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_113) ).

cnf(c_224,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X0,X1,X2)
    | n2(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).

cnf(c_331,plain,
    ( ~ n2(X0)
    | p3(X0,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_244) ).

cnf(c_386,plain,
    ( ~ p3(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ l1(X3,X1)
    | s4(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_299) ).

cnf(c_420,plain,
    m0(b,d,b),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

cnf(c_436,plain,
    ( ~ n2(b)
    | p3(b,b,b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_331]) ).

cnf(c_442,plain,
    ( ~ p1(b,b,b)
    | n2(b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_224]) ).

cnf(c_444,plain,
    ( ~ k0(b)
    | p1(b,b,b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_155]) ).

cnf(c_797,plain,
    ( ~ r0(X0)
    | ~ sP50_iProver_def ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP50_iProver_def])],[c_200]) ).

cnf(c_840,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X0,X1,X2)
    | l1(X1,X0)
    | ~ p0(X2,X1)
    | ~ sP76_iProver_def ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP76_iProver_def])],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_841,plain,
    ( sP50_iProver_def
    | sP76_iProver_def ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_850,plain,
    ( ~ r0(b)
    | ~ sP50_iProver_def ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_797]) ).

cnf(c_1190,plain,
    ( ~ m0(X0,d,X1)
    | ~ p0(X1,d)
    | ~ sP76_iProver_def
    | l1(d,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_840]) ).

cnf(c_1191,plain,
    ( ~ m0(b,d,b)
    | ~ p0(b,d)
    | ~ sP76_iProver_def
    | l1(d,b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1190]) ).

cnf(c_1426,plain,
    ( ~ p3(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ l1(d,X1)
    | s4(d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_386]) ).

cnf(c_1427,plain,
    ( ~ p3(b,b,b)
    | ~ l1(d,b)
    | s4(d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1426]) ).

cnf(c_1428,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1427,c_1191,c_850,c_841,c_444,c_442,c_436,c_420,c_59,c_49,c_58,c_81]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SYN211-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:17:27 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.45/1.22  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.45/1.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------  iProver source info
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.45/1.22  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.45/1.22  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 86 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Preprocessing...------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 2.45/1.22   gs_s  sp: 88 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Proving...
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  clauses                                 333
% 2.45/1.22  conjectures                             1
% 2.45/1.22  EPR                                     333
% 2.45/1.22  Horn                                    290
% 2.45/1.22  unary                                   51
% 2.45/1.22  binary                                  137
% 2.45/1.22  lits                                    812
% 2.45/1.22  lits eq                                 0
% 2.45/1.22  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.45/1.22  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.45/1.22  fd_cond                                 0
% 2.45/1.22  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 2.45/1.22  AC symbols                              0
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ 
% 2.45/1.22  Current options:
% 2.45/1.22  ------ 
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  ------ Proving...
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.45/1.22  
% 2.45/1.22  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------