TSTP Solution File: SYN201-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN201-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fYQs5NvRLU true
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.85s
% Output : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN201-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fYQs5NvRLU true
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:43:08 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.58/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.85 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.59/0.85 % BCE start: 369
% 0.59/0.85 % BCE eliminated: 40
% 0.59/0.85 % PE start: 329
% 0.59/0.85 logic: neq
% 0.59/0.85 % PE eliminated: -6
% 0.59/0.85 % done 144 iterations in 0.094s
% 0.59/0.85 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.59/0.85 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.59/0.85 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(s2_type, type, s2: $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(q2_type, type, q2: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(l1_type, type, l1: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(s1_type, type, s1: $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(rule_186, axiom, (( q2 @ G @ G @ H ) | ( ~( l1 @ H @ G ) ))).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl223, plain,
% 0.59/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (l1 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_186])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(rule_189, axiom,
% 0.59/0.85 (( s2 @ H ) | ( ~( q2 @ b @ H @ b ) ) | ( ~( s1 @ b ) ))).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl226, plain,
% 0.59/0.85 (![X0 : $i]: ( (s2 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ b @ X0 @ b) | ~ (s1 @ b))),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_189])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(axiom_14, axiom, (p0 @ b @ X)).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (p0 @ b @ X0)),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_14])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(rule_125, axiom, (( s1 @ I ) | ( ~( p0 @ I @ I ) ))).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (s1 @ X0) | ~ (p0 @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_125])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl678, plain, ( (s1 @ b)),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl162])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl693, plain,
% 0.59/0.85 (![X0 : $i]: ( (s2 @ X0) | ~ (q2 @ b @ X0 @ b))),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl226, zip_derived_cl678])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (s2 @ b)).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( s2 @ b )),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, (~ (s2 @ b)),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl694, plain, (~ (q2 @ b @ b @ b)),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl693, zip_derived_cl368])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl793, plain, (~ (l1 @ b @ b)),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl223, zip_derived_cl694])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(axiom_7, axiom, (n0 @ d @ b)).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, ( (n0 @ d @ b)),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_7])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(rule_002, axiom, (( l1 @ G @ G ) | ( ~( n0 @ H @ G ) ))).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain,
% 0.59/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (l1 @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (n0 @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_002])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl686, plain, ( (l1 @ b @ b)),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl39])).
% 0.59/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl794, plain, ($false),
% 0.59/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl793, zip_derived_cl686])).
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 % Terminating...
% 0.60/0.89 % Runner terminated.
% 0.60/0.90 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------