TSTP Solution File: SYN195-1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SYN195-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:00:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   83 (   0 equ;  34 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  13 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (  19 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    s0(d) ).

cnf(axiom_3,axiom,
    n0(d,e) ).

cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
    p0(b,X) ).

cnf(axiom_32,axiom,
    k0(b) ).

cnf(axiom_34,axiom,
    n0(c,d) ).

cnf(rule_001,axiom,
    ( k1(I)
    | ~ n0(J,I) ) ).

cnf(rule_002,axiom,
    ( l1(G,G)
    | ~ n0(H,G) ) ).

cnf(rule_072,axiom,
    ( p1(F,F,F)
    | ~ s0(G)
    | ~ s0(F) ) ).

cnf(rule_085,axiom,
    ( p1(B,B,B)
    | ~ p0(C,B) ) ).

cnf(rule_137,axiom,
    ( n2(A)
    | ~ p1(B,C,A) ) ).

cnf(rule_174,axiom,
    ( p2(H,H,H)
    | ~ n2(H)
    | ~ k1(e) ) ).

cnf(rule_240,axiom,
    ( n3(D)
    | ~ p2(E,F,D) ) ).

cnf(rule_244,axiom,
    ( p3(H,H,H)
    | ~ n2(H) ) ).

cnf(rule_299,axiom,
    ( s4(A)
    | ~ p3(B,C,D)
    | ~ l1(A,C) ) ).

cnf(rule_327,axiom,
    ( r5(C,D)
    | ~ s4(C)
    | ~ k0(b)
    | ~ n3(D) ) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r5(d,d) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ n3(D)
    | ~ s4(C)
    | r5(C,D) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k0(b) )],[axiom_32,rule_327]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ n0(d,e)
    | k1(e) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_001:[bind(I,$fot(e)),bind(J,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    k1(e),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(d,e) )],[axiom_3,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ n2(H)
    | p2(H,H,H) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( k1(e) )],[refute_0_2,rule_174]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ n2(X_108)
    | p2(X_108,X_108,X_108) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(H,$fot(X_108))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    p0(b,X_65),
    inference(subst,[],[axiom_14:[bind(X,$fot(X_65))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ p0(b,X_65)
    | p1(X_65,X_65,X_65) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_085:[bind(B,$fot(X_65)),bind(C,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    p1(X_65,X_65,X_65),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p0(b,X_65) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    p1(X_105,X_105,X_105),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X_65,$fot(X_105))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ p1(X_105,X_105,X_105)
    | n2(X_105) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_137:[bind(A,$fot(X_105)),bind(B,$fot(X_105)),bind(C,$fot(X_105))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    n2(X_105),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p1(X_105,X_105,X_105) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    n2(X_108),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_10:[bind(X_105,$fot(X_108))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    p2(X_108,X_108,X_108),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n2(X_108) )],[refute_0_11,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    p2(X_121,X_121,X_121),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_12:[bind(X_108,$fot(X_121))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ p2(X_121,X_121,X_121)
    | n3(X_121) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_240:[bind(D,$fot(X_121)),bind(E,$fot(X_121)),bind(F,$fot(X_121))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    n3(X_121),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p2(X_121,X_121,X_121) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    n3(D),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_15:[bind(X_121,$fot(D))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ s4(C)
    | r5(C,D) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n3(D) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ s4(d)
    | r5(d,D) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_17:[bind(C,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ n0(c,d)
    | l1(d,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_002:[bind(G,$fot(d)),bind(H,$fot(c))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    l1(d,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n0(c,d) )],[axiom_34,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ n2(d)
    | p3(d,d,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_244:[bind(H,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ s0(d)
    | p1(d,d,d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_072:[bind(F,$fot(d)),bind(G,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    p1(d,d,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( s0(d) )],[axiom_1,refute_0_22]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ p1(d,d,d)
    | n2(d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_137:[bind(A,$fot(d)),bind(B,$fot(d)),bind(C,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    n2(d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p1(d,d,d) )],[refute_0_23,refute_0_24]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    p3(d,d,d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( n2(d) )],[refute_0_25,refute_0_21]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ l1(X_343,d)
    | ~ p3(d,d,d)
    | s4(X_343) ),
    inference(subst,[],[rule_299:[bind(A,$fot(X_343)),bind(B,$fot(d)),bind(C,$fot(d)),bind(D,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ l1(X_343,d)
    | s4(X_343) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( p3(d,d,d) )],[refute_0_26,refute_0_27]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ l1(d,d)
    | s4(d) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_28:[bind(X_343,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    s4(d),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( l1(d,d) )],[refute_0_20,refute_0_29]) ).

cnf(refute_0_31,plain,
    r5(d,D),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( s4(d) )],[refute_0_30,refute_0_18]) ).

cnf(refute_0_32,plain,
    r5(d,d),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_31:[bind(D,$fot(d))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( r5(d,d) )],[refute_0_32,prove_this]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SYN195-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 22:27:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.33  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.49  
% 0.18/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------