TSTP Solution File: SYN193-10 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN193-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DAzEvhp9XV true
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:02:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.40s 1.26s
% Output : Refutation 2.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN193-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DAzEvhp9XV true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 17:56:22 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.39/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.39/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 2.40/1.26 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 2.40/1.26 % BCE start: 295
% 2.40/1.26 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 2.40/1.26 % PE start: 295
% 2.40/1.26 logic: eq
% 2.40/1.26 % PE eliminated: 0
% 2.40/1.26 % done 1026 iterations in 0.512s
% 2.40/1.26 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 2.40/1.26 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.40/1.26 thf(k0_type, type, k0: $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(q3_type, type, q3: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(e_type, type, e: $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(true_type, type, true: $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(m1_type, type, m1: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(r4_type, type, r4: $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(n3_type, type, n3: $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(ifeq_type, type, ifeq: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(q2_type, type, q2: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(n1_type, type, n1: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(r0_type, type, r0: $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(k1_type, type, k1: $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(p0_type, type, p0: $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(p2_type, type, p2: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(rule_012, axiom,
% 2.40/1.26 (( ifeq @ ( r0 @ e ) @ true @ ( m1 @ e @ e @ e ) @ true ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 2.40/1.26 (((ifeq @ (r0 @ e) @ true @ (m1 @ e @ e @ e) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_012])).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(axiom_13, axiom, (( r0 @ e ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain, (((r0 @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_13])).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(ifeq_axiom, axiom, (( ifeq @ A @ A @ B @ C ) = ( B ))).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(zip_derived_cl426, plain, (((m1 @ e @ e @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.26 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.40/1.26 [zip_derived_cl50, zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(rule_046, axiom,
% 2.40/1.26 (( ifeq @
% 2.40/1.26 ( m1 @ B @ C @ A ) @ true @
% 2.40/1.26 ( ifeq @ ( k0 @ B ) @ true @ ( n1 @ A @ A @ A ) @ true ) @ true ) =
% 2.40/1.26 ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.26 thf(zip_derived_cl84, plain,
% 2.40/1.26 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.26 ((ifeq @ (m1 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) @ true @
% 2.40/1.26 (ifeq @ (k0 @ X0) @ true @ (n1 @ X2 @ X2 @ X2) @ true) @ true)
% 2.40/1.26 = (true))),
% 2.40/1.26 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_046])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1127, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (k0 @ e) @ true @ (n1 @ e @ e @ e) @ true) @ true) = (
% 2.40/1.27 true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl426, zip_derived_cl84])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(axiom_28, axiom, (( k0 @ e ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain, (((k0 @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_28])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1134, plain, (((n1 @ e @ e @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.40/1.27 [zip_derived_cl1127, zip_derived_cl28, zip_derived_cl0,
% 2.40/1.27 zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(rule_179, axiom,
% 2.40/1.27 (( ifeq @
% 2.40/1.27 ( n1 @ J @ J @ A ) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 ( ifeq @ ( k1 @ A ) @ true @ ( q2 @ J @ J @ J ) @ true ) @ true ) =
% 2.40/1.27 ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl212, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (n1 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (k1 @ X1) @ true @ (q2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) @ true) @ true)
% 2.40/1.27 = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_179])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1355, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (k1 @ e) @ true @ (q2 @ e @ e @ e) @ true) @ true) = (
% 2.40/1.27 true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1134, zip_derived_cl212])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(axiom_3, axiom, (( n0 @ d @ e ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((n0 @ d @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_3])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(rule_001, axiom,
% 2.40/1.27 (( ifeq @ ( n0 @ J @ I ) @ true @ ( k1 @ I ) @ true ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (n0 @ X0 @ X1) @ true @ (k1 @ X1) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl295, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (k1 @ e) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl39])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl375, plain, (((true) = (k1 @ e))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl295, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1364, plain, (((q2 @ e @ e @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.40/1.27 [zip_derived_cl1355, zip_derived_cl375, zip_derived_cl0,
% 2.40/1.27 zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(rule_255, axiom,
% 2.40/1.27 (( ifeq @
% 2.40/1.27 ( q2 @ I @ G @ H ) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 ( ifeq @ ( n0 @ I @ G ) @ true @ ( q3 @ G @ H ) @ true ) @ true ) =
% 2.40/1.27 ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl255, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (q2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (n0 @ X0 @ X1) @ true @ (q3 @ X1 @ X2) @ true) @ true)
% 2.40/1.27 = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_255])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1607, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (n0 @ e @ e) @ true @ (q3 @ e @ e) @ true) @ true) = (
% 2.40/1.27 true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1364, zip_derived_cl255])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(axiom_30, axiom, (( n0 @ e @ e ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, (((n0 @ e @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_30])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1613, plain, (((q3 @ e @ e) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.40/1.27 [zip_derived_cl1607, zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl0,
% 2.40/1.27 zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(axiom_18, axiom, (( p0 @ c @ b ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (((p0 @ c @ b) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_18])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(rule_298, axiom,
% 2.40/1.27 (( ifeq @
% 2.40/1.27 ( q3 @ H @ I ) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 ( ifeq @
% 2.40/1.27 ( n3 @ G ) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 ( ifeq @ ( p0 @ J @ G ) @ true @ ( r4 @ G ) @ true ) @ true ) @
% 2.40/1.27 true ) =
% 2.40/1.27 ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl275, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (q3 @ X0 @ X1) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (n3 @ X2) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (p0 @ X3 @ X2) @ true @ (r4 @ X2) @ true) @ true) @
% 2.40/1.27 true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_298])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1961, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (q3 @ X1 @ X0) @ true @
% 2.40/1.27 (ifeq @ (n3 @ b) @ true @ (ifeq @ true @ true @ (r4 @ b) @ true) @
% 2.40/1.27 true) @
% 2.40/1.27 true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl275])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(axiom_7, axiom, (( n0 @ d @ b ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, (((n0 @ d @ b) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_7])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (n0 @ X0 @ X1) @ true @ (k1 @ X1) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_001])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl296, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (k1 @ b) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl39])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl304, plain, (((true) = (k1 @ b))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl296, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(rule_159, axiom,
% 2.40/1.27 (( ifeq @ ( k1 @ A ) @ true @ ( p2 @ A @ A @ A ) @ true ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl193, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (k1 @ X0) @ true @ (p2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X0) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_159])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl376, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (p2 @ b @ b @ b) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl304, zip_derived_cl193])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl489, plain, (((true) = (p2 @ b @ b @ b))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl376, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(rule_240, axiom,
% 2.40/1.27 (( ifeq @ ( p2 @ E @ F @ D ) @ true @ ( n3 @ D ) @ true ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl246, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (p2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) @ true @ (n3 @ X2) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_240])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl492, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (n3 @ b) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl489, zip_derived_cl246])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl517, plain, (((true) = (n3 @ b))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl492, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl1965, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 2.40/1.27 ((ifeq @ (q3 @ X1 @ X0) @ true @ (r4 @ b) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 2.40/1.27 [zip_derived_cl1961, zip_derived_cl517, zip_derived_cl0,
% 2.40/1.27 zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl4101, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (((ifeq @ true @ true @ (r4 @ b) @ true) = (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1613, zip_derived_cl1965])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 2.40/1.27 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: ((ifeq @ X1 @ X1 @ X0 @ X2) = (X0))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ifeq_axiom])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl4102, plain, (((true) = (r4 @ b))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4101, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(prove_this, conjecture, (( r4 @ b ) = ( true ))).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( r4 @ b ) != ( true )),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl294, plain, (((r4 @ b) != (true))),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 2.40/1.27 thf(zip_derived_cl4103, plain, ($false),
% 2.40/1.27 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 2.40/1.27 [zip_derived_cl4102, zip_derived_cl294])).
% 2.40/1.27
% 2.40/1.27 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.40/1.27
% 2.40/1.27
% 2.40/1.27 % Terminating...
% 2.40/1.35 % Runner terminated.
% 2.40/1.37 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------