TSTP Solution File: SYN191-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN191-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:21:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.66s 0.85s
% Output : Refutation 0.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 32 ~; 24 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 11 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f474,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f401,f441,f466]) ).
fof(f466,plain,
~ spl0_6,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f465]) ).
fof(f465,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f464,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
s0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).
fof(f464,plain,
( ~ s0(b)
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f451,f32]) ).
fof(f32,axiom,
k0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_32) ).
fof(f451,plain,
( ~ k0(b)
| ~ s0(b)
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f400,f99]) ).
fof(f99,axiom,
! [X4] :
( n1(X4,X4,X4)
| ~ k0(X4)
| ~ s0(X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_061) ).
fof(f400,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ n1(X0,b,X0)
| ~ spl0_6 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f399]) ).
fof(f399,plain,
( spl0_6
<=> ! [X0] : ~ n1(X0,b,X0) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_6])]) ).
fof(f441,plain,
spl0_4,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f440]) ).
fof(f440,plain,
( $false
| spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f439,f24]) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
l0(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_24) ).
fof(f439,plain,
( ~ l0(c)
| spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f424,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
r0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).
fof(f424,plain,
( ~ r0(b)
| ~ l0(c)
| spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f419,f73]) ).
fof(f73,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( m1(X2,X3,X2)
| ~ r0(X2)
| ~ l0(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_035) ).
fof(f419,plain,
( ~ m1(b,c,b)
| spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f392,f214]) ).
fof(f214,axiom,
! [X8,X7] :
( p2(X7,X8,X7)
| ~ m1(X8,X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_176) ).
fof(f392,plain,
( ~ p2(c,b,c)
| spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f390]) ).
fof(f390,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> p2(c,b,c) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f401,plain,
( ~ spl0_4
| spl0_6 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f397,f399,f390]) ).
fof(f397,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ n1(X0,b,X0)
| ~ p2(c,b,c) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f386,f18]) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
p0(c,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_18) ).
fof(f386,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ p0(c,b)
| ~ n1(X0,b,X0)
| ~ p2(c,b,c) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f371,f190]) ).
fof(f190,axiom,
! [X8,X6,X7] :
( p2(X6,X7,X7)
| ~ p0(X6,X7)
| ~ n1(X8,X7,X8)
| ~ p2(X6,X7,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_152) ).
fof(f371,plain,
! [X0] : ~ p2(c,X0,b),
inference(resolution,[],[f369,f305]) ).
fof(f305,axiom,
! [X11,X6,X7] :
( r3(X11,X6,X11)
| ~ p2(X11,X7,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_267) ).
fof(f369,axiom,
~ r3(c,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SYN191-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:50:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.21/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.66/0.84 % (23318)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23311)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23313)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23312)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23314)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23315)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23316)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23318)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (23318)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.84 % (23318)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23317)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.66/0.84 % (23318)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.66/0.84
% 0.66/0.84 % (23318)Memory used [KB]: 1286
% 0.66/0.84 % (23318)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.66/0.84 % (23318)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23318)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23318)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (23314)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.66/0.85
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)Memory used [KB]: 1280
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23314)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/55Mi)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (23325)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (23311)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.66/0.85
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)Memory used [KB]: 1408
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.66/0.85
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)Memory used [KB]: 1280
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23325)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23311)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)First to succeed.
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-23151"
% 0.66/0.85 % (23315)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (23315)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23315)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23315)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.66/0.85
% 0.66/0.85 % (23315)Memory used [KB]: 1430
% 0.66/0.85 % (23315)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.66/0.85 % (23315)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.66/0.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.66/0.85 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)------------------------------
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.66/0.85
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)Memory used [KB]: 1431
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.66/0.85 % (23316)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.66/0.85 % (23151)Success in time 0.48 s
% 0.66/0.85 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------