TSTP Solution File: SYN191-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN191-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:43:42 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.85s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 57 ( 0 equ; 28 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_029,axiom,
( m1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X2)
| ~ s0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_029) ).
cnf(rule_057,axiom,
( n1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ r0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_057) ).
cnf(rule_176,axiom,
( p2(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ m1(X2,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_176) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
s0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(rule_152,axiom,
( p2(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ n1(X3,X2,X3)
| ~ p0(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X1,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_152) ).
cnf(axiom_9,axiom,
r0(b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_9) ).
cnf(rule_267,axiom,
( r3(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ p2(X1,X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_267) ).
cnf(axiom_18,axiom,
p0(c,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_18) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ r3(c,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( m1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X2)
| ~ s0(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_029]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( n1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ r0(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_057]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( p2(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ m1(X2,X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_176]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( m1(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ p0(X1,X2)
| ~ s0(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
p0(b,X1),
axiom_14 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
s0(b),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( p2(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ n1(X3,X2,X3)
| ~ p0(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X1,X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_152]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( n1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ r0(X1) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
r0(b),
axiom_9 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( p2(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ m1(X2,X1,X2) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
m1(b,X1,b),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( p2(X1,X2,X2)
| ~ n1(X3,X2,X3)
| ~ p0(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X1,X2,X1) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
n1(b,b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
p2(X1,b,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( r3(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ p2(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_267]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( p2(X1,b,b)
| ~ p0(X1,b) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
p0(c,b),
axiom_18 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ r3(c,b,c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( r3(X1,X2,X1)
| ~ p2(X1,X3,X2) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
p2(c,b,b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ r3(c,b,c),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN191-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:50:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/0.57 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.85/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.85/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # new_bool_1 with pid 23232 completed with status 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.85/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.85/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.85/0.57 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.85/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 23240 completed with status 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.85/0.57 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.85/0.57 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.85/0.57 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.85/0.57 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.85/0.57 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.57 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.85/0.57 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.85/0.57
% 0.85/0.57 # Proof found!
% 0.85/0.57 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.85/0.57 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.85/0.57 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.85/0.57 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 38
% 0.85/0.57 # Initial clauses : 331
% 0.85/0.57 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.85/0.57 # Initial clauses in saturation : 326
% 0.85/0.57 # Processed clauses : 806
% 0.85/0.57 # ...of these trivial : 33
% 0.85/0.57 # ...subsumed : 30
% 0.85/0.57 # ...remaining for further processing : 743
% 0.85/0.57 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Backward-subsumed : 15
% 0.85/0.57 # Backward-rewritten : 59
% 0.85/0.57 # Generated clauses : 916
% 0.85/0.57 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 624
% 0.85/0.57 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.85/0.57 # Paramodulations : 916
% 0.85/0.57 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # NegExts : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Total rewrite steps : 619
% 0.85/0.57 # ...of those cached : 461
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.57 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.57 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.57 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.57 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.57 # Current number of processed clauses : 377
% 0.85/0.57 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 134
% 0.85/0.57 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.85/0.57 # Non-unit-clauses : 241
% 0.85/0.57 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 415
% 0.85/0.57 # ...number of literals in the above : 1041
% 0.85/0.57 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Current number of archived clauses : 366
% 0.85/0.57 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34254
% 0.85/0.57 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24025
% 0.85/0.57 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 35
% 0.85/0.57 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 354
% 0.85/0.57 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # BW rewrite match attempts : 99
% 0.85/0.57 # BW rewrite match successes : 53
% 0.85/0.57 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.85/0.57 # Termbank termtop insertions : 22299
% 0.85/0.57 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1515
% 0.85/0.57
% 0.85/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.85/0.57 # User time : 0.063 s
% 0.85/0.57 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.85/0.57 # Total time : 0.068 s
% 0.85/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2608 pages
% 0.85/0.57
% 0.85/0.57 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.85/0.57 # User time : 0.068 s
% 0.85/0.57 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.85/0.57 # Total time : 0.076 s
% 0.85/0.57 # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.85/0.57 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.85/0.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------