TSTP Solution File: SYN169-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN169-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:57:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 17 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_067,axiom,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_067) ).
cnf(rule_137,axiom,
( n2(X1)
| ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_17) ).
cnf(rule_244,axiom,
( p3(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ n2(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_244) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(X1,d,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_067]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( n2(X1)
| ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_137]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( p1(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ q0(X2,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
q0(X1,d),
axiom_17 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( p3(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ n2(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_244]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( n2(X1)
| ~ p1(X2,X3,X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
p1(d,d,d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(X1,d,X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( p3(X1,X1,X1)
| ~ n2(X1) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
n2(d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(X1,d,X2),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.08 % Problem : SYN169-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.06/0.08 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:53:23 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.37 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.41 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.12/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 28190 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.12/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.41 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 28195 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.12/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.41 # Search class: FHUNM-FSLM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.12/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 369
% 0.12/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Initial clauses : 369
% 0.12/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.12/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 362
% 0.12/0.41 # Processed clauses : 542
% 0.12/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.12/0.41 # ...subsumed : 22
% 0.12/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 511
% 0.12/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.12/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 25
% 0.12/0.41 # Generated clauses : 106
% 0.12/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 83
% 0.12/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.12/0.41 # Paramodulations : 106
% 0.12/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 126
% 0.12/0.41 # ...of those cached : 63
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 154
% 0.12/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 78
% 0.12/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.12/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 74
% 0.12/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 227
% 0.12/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 702
% 0.12/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 357
% 0.12/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25064
% 0.12/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16866
% 0.12/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 28
% 0.12/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 201
% 0.12/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 29
% 0.12/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 0.12/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13873
% 0.12/0.41 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1461
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.41 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.12/0.41 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.41 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.12/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2640 pages
% 0.12/0.41
% 0.12/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.41 # User time : 0.109 s
% 0.12/0.41 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.41 # Total time : 0.120 s
% 0.12/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.12/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------