TSTP Solution File: SYN156-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN156-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:10:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.70s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN156-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:22:53 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.39 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.39 Mon Jul 11 20:22:53 2022
% 0.15/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 18979.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 list(usable).
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.15/0.39 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.15/0.39 in usable.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.39 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -q0(B,C)| -q0(B,A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(A,A,A)| -l0(A)| -k0(A)| -m0(A,A,A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} m1(e,e,e)| -r0(e).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,A)| -n0(e,b)| -k0(b)| -k0(A)| -k1(B).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(A,A,B)| -p0(B,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p1(e,e,e)| -r0(e)| -k0(e).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A)| -m0(B,B,C).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -s0(A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 88 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(d,d,d)| -k0(e)| -s0(d).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(b,b,b)| -r0(b).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(B,C,A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 99 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(A,B,A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q1(A,A,A)| -m0(c,A,A)| -r0(A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 142 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p2(A,A,A)| -s1(A)| -k1(A).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -n2(A)| -q2(B,C,A)| -s1(B).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 224 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p3(A,A,A)| -k1(A)| -n2(A).
% 0.15/0.39 13 back subsumes 9.
% 0.15/0.39 14 back subsumes 6.
% 0.15/0.39 28 back subsumes 21.
% 0.15/0.39 28 back subsumes 17.
% 0.15/0.39 40 back subsumes 39.
% 0.15/0.39 52 back subsumes 51.
% 0.15/0.39 77 back subsumes 68.
% 0.15/0.39 77 back subsumes 65.
% 0.15/0.39 142 back subsumes 134.
% 0.15/0.39 194 back subsumes 180.
% 0.15/0.39 216 back subsumes 213.
% 0.15/0.39 216 back subsumes 212.
% 0.15/0.39 244 back subsumes 239.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 321 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p0(b,c).
% 0.15/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 324 during input processing: 0 [] {-} q0(d,d).
% 0.15/0.39 321 back subsumes 317.
% 0.15/0.39 324 back subsumes 309.
% 0.15/0.39 326 back subsumes 315.
% 0.15/0.39 326 back subsumes 311.
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.70/0.89 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.70/0.89 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.70/0.89 number of clauses in intial UL: 294
% 0.70/0.89 number of clauses initially in problem: 326
% 0.70/0.89 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.70/0.89 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.70/0.89 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.70/0.89 absolute distinct symbol count: 53
% 0.70/0.89 distinct predicate count: 48
% 0.70/0.89 distinct function count: 0
% 0.70/0.89 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89
% 0.70/0.89 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.70/0.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/0.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.49 sec ----> 922 [binary,921.1,307.1] {-} $F.
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 Length of proof is 27. Level of proof is 7.
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.70/0.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/0.90 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 2 [] {+} l1(A,A)| -n0(B,A).
% 0.70/0.90 3 [] {+} l1(A,B)| -p0(C,A)| -r0(D)| -m0(B,A,C).
% 0.70/0.90 7 [] {+} m1(A,B,A)| -p0(C,B)| -r0(A).
% 0.70/0.90 74 [] {+} p1(A,B,C)| -m0(C,A,D)| -p1(C,A,D).
% 0.70/0.90 77 [] {+} p1(A,A,A)| -p0(B,A).
% 0.70/0.90 83 [] {+} q1(A,B,A)| -n0(C,B)| -p0(D,A).
% 0.70/0.90 108 [] {+} r1(A)| -q0(A,B)| -s0(d)| -q1(d,B,d).
% 0.70/0.90 118 [] {+} m2(A)| -s0(A)| -l1(B,C).
% 0.70/0.90 120 [] {+} n2(A)| -p1(B,C,A).
% 0.70/0.90 129 [] {+} p2(A,B,B)| -p1(A,C,D)| -l1(C,D)| -p2(A,B,A).
% 0.70/0.90 157 [] {+} p2(A,A,A)| -l1(B,A).
% 0.70/0.90 158 [] {+} p2(A,B,A)| -m1(B,A,B).
% 0.70/0.90 168 [] {+} q2(A,A,B)| -l1(B,A).
% 0.70/0.90 170 [] {+} r2(A)| -r1(A)| -l0(A).
% 0.70/0.90 182 [] {+} k3(A,A,B)| -p1(B,C,A)| -m2(D)| -m2(C).
% 0.70/0.90 216 [] {+} m3(A,A,A)| -n2(A).
% 0.70/0.90 220 [] {+} n3(A)| -p2(B,C,A).
% 0.70/0.90 222 [] {+} p3(A,B,C)| -r2(B)| -k3(B,C,A).
% 0.70/0.90 229 [] {+} p3(A,B,B)| -m3(B,C,D)| -p2(A,B,D).
% 0.70/0.90 233 [] {+} q3(A,B)| -q2(C,A,B)| -n0(C,A).
% 0.70/0.90 252 [] {+} k4(c)| -n0(c,d)| -q3(e,b)| -n3(e).
% 0.70/0.90 257 [] {+} n4(A,B)| -p3(A,B,B)| -n4(A,A).
% 0.70/0.90 260 [] {+} n4(A,A)| -k4(B)| -m3(A,A,A).
% 0.70/0.90 307 [] {+} -n4(a,e).
% 0.70/0.90 308 [] {-} s0(d).
% 0.70/0.90 310 [] {-} n0(d,e).
% 0.70/0.90 318 [] {-} n0(e,b).
% 0.70/0.90 319 [] {-} m0(a,A,a).
% 0.70/0.90 320 [] {-} r0(e).
% 0.70/0.90 321 [] {-} p0(b,A).
% 0.70/0.90 325 [] {-} p0(c,b).
% 0.70/0.90 326 [] {-} m0(A,d,B).
% 0.70/0.90 327 [] {-} l0(a).
% 0.70/0.90 332 [] {-} m0(e,b,c).
% 0.70/0.90 335 [] {-} n0(e,e).
% 0.70/0.90 339 [] {-} n0(c,d).
% 0.70/0.90 341 [] {-} q0(a,b).
% 0.70/0.90 342 [] {-} n0(b,a).
% 0.70/0.90 360 [hyper,310,2] {-} l1(e,e).
% 0.70/0.90 385 [hyper,321,83,318] {-} q1(A,b,A).
% 0.70/0.90 387 [hyper,321,77] {-} p1(A,A,A).
% 0.70/0.90 396 [hyper,321,7,320] {-} m1(e,A,e).
% 0.70/0.90 416 [hyper,326,3,321,320] {-} l1(d,A).
% 0.70/0.90 434 [hyper,332,3,325,320] {-} l1(b,e).
% 0.70/0.90 437 [hyper,342,2] {-} l1(a,a).
% 0.70/0.90 450 [hyper,360,118,308] {-} m2(d).
% 0.70/0.90 473 [hyper,416,157] {-} p2(A,A,A).
% 0.70/0.90 475 [hyper,434,168] {-} q2(e,e,b).
% 0.70/0.90 511 [hyper,385,108,341,308] {-} r1(a).
% 0.70/0.90 514 [hyper,511,170,327] {-} r2(a).
% 0.70/0.90 524 [hyper,387,120] {-} n2(A).
% 0.70/0.90 527 [hyper,387,74,319] {-} p1(a,A,a).
% 0.70/0.90 528 [hyper,524,216] {-} m3(A,A,A).
% 0.70/0.90 537 [hyper,396,158] {-} p2(A,e,A).
% 0.70/0.90 648 [hyper,473,220] {-} n3(A).
% 0.70/0.90 666 [hyper,475,233,335] {-} q3(e,b).
% 0.70/0.90 667 [hyper,666,252,339,648] {-} k4(c).
% 0.70/0.90 729 [hyper,527,74,319] {-} p1(A,B,a).
% 0.70/0.90 730 [hyper,528,260,667] {-} n4(A,A).
% 0.70/0.90 835 [hyper,729,182,450,450] {-} k3(a,a,A).
% 0.70/0.90 838 [hyper,729,129,437,537] {-} p2(A,e,e).
% 0.70/0.90 894 [hyper,835,222,514] {-} p3(A,a,a).
% 0.70/0.90 898 [hyper,838,229,528] {-} p3(A,e,e).
% 0.70/0.90 918 [hyper,894,257,730] {-} n4(A,a).
% 0.70/0.90 921 [hyper,898,257,918] {-} n4(a,e).
% 0.70/0.90 922 [binary,921.1,307.1] {-} $F.
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.90 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 ============ end of search ============
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.70/0.90
% 0.70/0.90 Process 18979 finished Mon Jul 11 20:22:53 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------