TSTP Solution File: SYN152-1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN152-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 23:53:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (   8 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  113 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  136 (  61   ~;  54   |;   0   &)
%                                         (  21 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :    1 (   1 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   4   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (  36   !;   0   ?;  39   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(n2_type,type,
    n2: $i > $o ).

tff(e_type,type,
    e: $i ).

tff(p1_type,type,
    p1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(k0_type,type,
    k0: $i > $o ).

tff(r0_type,type,
    r0: $i > $o ).

tff(1,plain,
    ( ~ n2(e)
  <=> ~ n2(e) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(2,axiom,
    ~ n2(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

tff(3,plain,
    ~ n2(e),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[2,1]) ).

tff(4,plain,
    ^ [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
      refl(
        ( ( n2(A)
          | ~ p1(B,C,A) )
      <=> ( n2(A)
          | ~ p1(B,C,A) ) )),
    inference(bind,[status(th)],]) ).

tff(5,plain,
    ( ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
        ( n2(A)
        | ~ p1(B,C,A) )
  <=> ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
        ( n2(A)
        | ~ p1(B,C,A) ) ),
    inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

tff(6,plain,
    ( ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
        ( n2(A)
        | ~ p1(B,C,A) )
  <=> ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
        ( n2(A)
        | ~ p1(B,C,A) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(7,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
      ( n2(A)
      | ~ p1(B,C,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_137) ).

tff(8,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
      ( n2(A)
      | ~ p1(B,C,A) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7,6]) ).

tff(9,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
      ( n2(A)
      | ~ p1(B,C,A) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[8]) ).

tff(10,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
      ( n2(A)
      | ~ p1(B,C,A) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9,5]) ).

tff(11,plain,
    ( p1(e,e,e)
  <=> p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(12,plain,
    ( ( $false
      | $false
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(13,plain,
    ( ~ $true
  <=> $false ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(14,axiom,
    k0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_28) ).

tff(15,plain,
    ( k0(e)
  <=> $true ),
    inference(iff_true,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

tff(16,plain,
    ( ~ k0(e)
  <=> ~ $true ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

tff(17,plain,
    ( ~ k0(e)
  <=> $false ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[16,13]) ).

tff(18,axiom,
    r0(e),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',axiom_13) ).

tff(19,plain,
    ( r0(e)
  <=> $true ),
    inference(iff_true,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

tff(20,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
  <=> ~ $true ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

tff(21,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
  <=> $false ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[20,13]) ).

tff(22,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( $false
      | $false
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[21,17]) ).

tff(23,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[22,12]) ).

tff(24,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(25,plain,
    ( ( ~ r0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ k0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(26,plain,
    ( ( p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ r0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(27,plain,
    ( ( p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ k0(e) ) ),
    inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

tff(28,plain,
    ( ( p1(e,e,e)
      | ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e) )
  <=> ( ~ r0(e)
      | ~ k0(e)
      | p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[27,25]) ).

tff(29,axiom,
    ( p1(e,e,e)
    | ~ r0(e)
    | ~ k0(e) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SYN001-0.ax',rule_090) ).

tff(30,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[29,28]) ).

tff(31,plain,
    ( ~ r0(e)
    | ~ k0(e)
    | p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[30,24]) ).

tff(32,plain,
    p1(e,e,e),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[31,23]) ).

tff(33,plain,
    p1(e,e,e),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[32,11]) ).

tff(34,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
            ( n2(A)
            | ~ p1(B,C,A) )
      | n2(e)
      | ~ p1(e,e,e) )
  <=> ( ~ ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
            ( n2(A)
            | ~ p1(B,C,A) )
      | n2(e)
      | ~ p1(e,e,e) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(35,plain,
    ( ~ ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
          ( n2(A)
          | ~ p1(B,C,A) )
    | n2(e)
    | ~ p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],]) ).

tff(36,plain,
    ( ~ ! [B: $i,A: $i,C: $i] :
          ( n2(A)
          | ~ p1(B,C,A) )
    | n2(e)
    | ~ p1(e,e,e) ),
    inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[35,34]) ).

tff(37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[36,33,10,3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN152-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 01:57:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.14/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.14/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.14/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.14/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.14/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.14/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.14/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.14/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.14/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.14/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.14/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------