TSTP Solution File: SYN102-1.007.007 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN102-1.007.007 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:32:22 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32531/SYN/SYN102-1.007.007+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 192] [nf = 44] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 444] [nf = 108] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2049] [nf = 505] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4665] [nf = 1116] [nu = 0] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 7637974] [nf = 369568] [nu = 2596864] [ut = 526]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 30647667
% resolvents: 29921488 factors: 726179
% Number of unit clauses generated: 7028992
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 22.93
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 14 [7] = 512
% [8] = 512
% Total = 1038
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 7028992 [2] = 6646246 [3] = 8355299 [4] = 6485761 [5] = 2085419 [6] = 43710
% [7] = 2240
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] nq_1_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [1] nq_2_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] nq_3_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [3] nq_4_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [4] nq_5_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [5] nq_6_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [6] nq_7_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [7] p_0_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] p_10_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] p_11_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] p_12_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [11] p_13_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [12] p_14_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] p_1_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] p_2_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] p_3_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] p_4_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] p_5_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] p_6_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [19] p_7_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [20] p_8_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [21] p_9_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [22] q_0_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] q_10_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] q_11_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] q_12_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [26] q_13_7 (+)128 (-)0
% [27] q_14_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] q_1_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] q_2_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] q_3_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] q_4_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] q_5_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] q_6_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] q_7_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] q_8_7 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] q_9_7 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1038 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1038
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 441392759
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 66033531
% Number of successful unifications: 30647667
% Number of unification failures: 1018681972
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 80707242
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 142072223
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 35
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 4404224
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 7
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 1025
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 7182
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 120000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.14
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 73
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1049329639
% ConstructUnitClause() = 4405248
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 5.79 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 102159
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------