TSTP Solution File: SYN093-1.002 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : SYN093-1.002 : TPTP v3.4.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art10.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 unknown
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1000MB
% OS : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN093-1.002+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: nne
% detected subclass: medium
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 27 #f 1 7)
% (binary-unit 10 #f 1 7)
% (binary-double 16 #f 1 7)
% (binary 54 #t 1 7)
% (binary-order 27 #f 1 7)
% (binary-posweight-order 125 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 54 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 27 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 54 #f)
% (binary-order 54 #f)
% (hyper-order 43 #f)
% (binary 109 #t)
%
%
% SOS clause
% u_1(0) | -p_1_2(0).
% was split for some strategies as:
% u_1(0).
% -p_1_2(0).
%
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(26,40,0,52,0,0)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 27 [] -u_1(0).
% 28 [] -p_1_1(0) | -p_2_2(0) | p_1_2(0) | u_2(0).
% 29 [] -u_2(0) | p_1_2(0).
% 44 [?] ?
% 45 [] -u_10(0) | p_1_1(0).
% 48 [?] ?
% 49 [] -u_12(0) | p_2_2(0).
% 52 [] -p_1_2(0) | u_1(0).
% 65 [input:44,binarycut:45] p_1_1(0).
% 85 [input:48,binarycut:49] p_2_2(0).
% 88 [hyper:28,85,65,binarycut:29] p_1_2(0).
% 92 [hyper:52,88,cut:27] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 7
% clause depth limited to 1
% seconds given: 9
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 18
% derived clauses: 35
% kept clauses: 2
% kept size sum: 4
% kept mid-nuclei: 14
% kept new demods: 0
% forw unit-subs: 2
% forw double-subs: 0
% forw overdouble-subs: 0
% backward subs: 14
% fast unit cutoff: 1
% full unit cutoff: 0
% dbl unit cutoff: 7
% real runtime: 0.1
% process. runtime: 0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 0
% length fails: 0
% strength fails: 0
% predlist fails: 0
% aux str. fails: 0
% by-lit fails: 0
% full subs tried: 0
% full subs fail: 0
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN093-1.002+noeq.in")
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------