TSTP Solution File: SYN093-1.002 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN093-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:44:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN093-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:00:27 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File : SYN093-1.002 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.19/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem : Plaisted problem u(t(2,2))
% 0.19/0.61 % Version : Biased.
% 0.19/0.61 % English :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [Pla94] Plaisted (1994), The Search Efficiency of Theorem Prov
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [Pla94]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names : U(T2n) [Pla94]
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.33 v5.5.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 1 unt; 12 nHn; 26 RR)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of literals : 63 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 19 ( 19 usr; 19 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_PRP
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments : Biased away from various calculi.
% 0.19/0.61 % : tptp2X: -f tptp -s2 SYN093-1.g
% 0.19/0.61 % Bugfixes : v1.2.0 - Bugfix in SYN086-1.
% 0.19/0.61 % : v1.2.1 - Bugfix in SYN086-1.
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_goal_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_1
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ p_1_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_1_s2_goal_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ~ u_1 ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type11_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_2
% 0.19/0.61 | p_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ p_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ p_1_1 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_2_s2_type11_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( p_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type11_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_3
% 0.19/0.61 | p_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ q_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ q_1_1 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_3_s2_type11_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( p_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_3 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type12_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_4
% 0.19/0.61 | q_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ p_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ q_1_1 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_4_s2_type12_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( q_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_4 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type12_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_5
% 0.19/0.61 | q_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ q_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ p_1_1 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_5_s2_type12_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( q_1_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_5 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type21_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_6
% 0.19/0.61 | p_1_1
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ p_1_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_6_s2_type21_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( p_1_1
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_6 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type21_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_7
% 0.19/0.61 | q_1_1
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ q_1_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_7_s2_type21_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( q_1_1
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_7 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type22_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_8
% 0.19/0.61 | p_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ p_1_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_8_s2_type22_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( p_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_8 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_s2_type22_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( u_9
% 0.19/0.61 | q_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ q_1_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(u_9_s2_type22_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( q_2_2
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ u_9 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_t2_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( u_10
% 0.19/0.62 | p_1_1 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_10_t2_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( p_1_1
% 0.19/0.62 | ~ u_10 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_t2_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( u_11
% 0.19/0.62 | q_1_1 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_11_t2_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( q_1_1
% 0.19/0.62 | ~ u_11 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_t2_3,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( u_12
% 0.19/0.62 | p_2_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_12_t2_3,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( p_2_2
% 0.19/0.62 | ~ u_12 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_t2_4,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( u_13
% 0.19/0.62 | q_2_2 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(u_13_t2_4,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ( q_2_2
% 0.19/0.62 | ~ u_13 ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.62 %ClaNum:26(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.62 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.62 %SharedTerms:39
% 0.19/0.62 %goalClause: 6
% 0.19/0.62 [1]~P1(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [2]P2(a500)+P8(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [3]P3(a500)+P9(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [4]P5(a500)+P11(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [5]P6(a500)+P10(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [6]P1(a500)+~P4(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [7]P4(a500)+~P12(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [8]P4(a500)+~P13(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [9]P2(a500)+~P14(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [10]P2(a500)+~P8(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [11]P3(a500)+~P15(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [12]P3(a500)+~P9(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [13]P5(a500)+~P19(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [14]P5(a500)+~P11(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [15]P6(a500)+~P18(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [16]P6(a500)+~P10(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [17]P7(a500)+~P16(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [18]P7(a500)+~P17(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [19]P2(a500)+P14(a500)+~P4(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [20]P3(a500)+P15(a500)+~P4(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [21]P5(a500)+P19(a500)+~P7(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [22]P6(a500)+P18(a500)+~P7(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [23]P4(a500)+P12(a500)+~P2(a500)+~P3(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [24]P4(a500)+P13(a500)+~P5(a500)+~P6(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [25]P16(a500)+P7(a500)+~P2(a500)+~P6(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 [26]P7(a500)+P17(a500)+~P3(a500)+~P5(a500)
% 0.19/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P4(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P12(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,7])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P2(a500)+~P3(a500)+P12(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,23])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(32,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P2(a500)+~P3(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,30])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P8(a500)+~P3(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,32])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(35,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P9(a500)+P8(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,34])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P8(a500)+~P3(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,32])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(41,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P9(a500)+P8(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,34])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(48,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P8(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[35,41])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(50,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P3(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[48,39])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(51,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P9(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[50,3])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(53,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P9(a500)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[50,12])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(57,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 ($false),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[51,53]),
% 0.19/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------