TSTP Solution File: SYN084-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN084-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:09:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN084-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:14:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Tue Jul 12 01:14:12 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 7062.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.37 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.37 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.21/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.21/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.21/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 5
% 0.21/0.41 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.21/0.41 distinct function count: 1
% 0.21/0.41 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.21/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Model 2 [ 1 0 59 ] (0.00 seconds, 548 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Model 3 [ 1 0 189 ] (0.00 seconds, 640 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Model 4 [ 1 0 35 ] (0.00 seconds, 553 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Model 5 [ 3 1 102 ] (0.00 seconds, 761 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.06 sec ----> 86 [hyper,85,3,70] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Length of proof is 13. Level of proof is 10.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.21/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 1 [] {+} big_p(f(f(A)))|big_p(A)| -big_p(a).
% 0.21/0.45 2 [] {+} big_p(f(f(A)))| -big_p(f(A))| -big_p(a).
% 0.21/0.45 3 [] {+} -big_p(f(f(sk1)))| -big_p(f(f(sk2))).
% 0.21/0.45 4 [] {+} big_p(f(sk1))|big_p(f(sk2))| -big_p(sk1)| -big_p(sk2).
% 0.21/0.45 5 [] {+} big_p(f(sk1))| -big_p(sk1)| -big_p(f(f(sk2))).
% 0.21/0.45 6 [] {+} big_p(f(sk2))| -big_p(sk2)| -big_p(f(f(sk1))).
% 0.21/0.45 7 [] {-} big_p(a).
% 0.21/0.45 8 [hyper,7,1] {+} big_p(f(f(A)))|big_p(A).
% 0.21/0.45 12 [hyper,8,3,8] {+} big_p(sk2)|big_p(sk1).
% 0.21/0.45 36 [hyper,12,6,8,factor_simp] {+} big_p(sk1)|big_p(f(sk2)).
% 0.21/0.45 38 [hyper,12,5,8,factor_simp] {+} big_p(sk2)|big_p(f(sk1)).
% 0.21/0.45 43 [hyper,36,2,7] {+} big_p(sk1)|big_p(f(f(sk2))).
% 0.21/0.45 44 [hyper,38,4,36,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} big_p(f(sk1))|big_p(f(sk2)).
% 0.21/0.45 49 [hyper,43,3,8,factor_simp] {+} big_p(sk1).
% 0.21/0.45 63 [hyper,44,2,7] {-} big_p(f(sk1))|big_p(f(f(sk2))).
% 0.21/0.45 67 [hyper,63,5,49,factor_simp] {+} big_p(f(sk1)).
% 0.21/0.45 70 [hyper,67,2,7] {+} big_p(f(f(sk1))).
% 0.21/0.45 82 [hyper,70,3,8] {+} big_p(sk2).
% 0.21/0.45 83 [hyper,82,6,70] {+} big_p(f(sk2)).
% 0.21/0.45 85 [hyper,83,2,7] {+} big_p(f(f(sk2))).
% 0.21/0.45 86 [hyper,85,3,70] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.45 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 true clauses given 11 (52.4%)
% 0.21/0.45 false clauses given 10
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 FALSE TRUE
% 0.21/0.45 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Model 5 [ 3 1 102 ] (0.00 seconds, 761 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Process 7062 finished Tue Jul 12 01:14:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------