TSTP Solution File: SYN080-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : SYN080-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.98s 1.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 10 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 2 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 (; 13 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp > g > f > b > a
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
a: $i ).
tff(f,type,
f: $i > $i ).
tff(g,type,
g: $i > $i ).
tff(b,type,
b: $i ).
tff(f_23,axiom,
! [X,Y] : ( f(X) = g(Y) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_25,axiom,
f(f(a)) != f(g(b)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [Y_2,X_1] : ( g(Y_2) = f(X_1) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).
tff(c_5,plain,
! [Y_3,X_4] : ( g(Y_3) = f(X_4) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).
tff(c_13,plain,
! [X_4,X_1] : ( f(X_4) = f(X_1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_5]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
f(g(b)) != f(f(a)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).
tff(c_78,plain,
! [Y_9] : ( g(Y_9) != f(f(a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_4]) ).
tff(c_80,plain,
! [Y_9,X_4] : ( g(Y_9) != f(f(X_4)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_13,c_78]) ).
tff(c_95,plain,
! [Y_9,X_4] : ( g(Y_9) != f(X_4) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_13,c_80]) ).
tff(c_98,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_2]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN080-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 17:41:31 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.98/1.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.98/1.58
% 1.98/1.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.54/1.60
% 2.54/1.60 Inference rules
% 2.54/1.60 ----------------------
% 2.54/1.60 #Ref : 0
% 2.54/1.60 #Sup : 42
% 2.54/1.60 #Fact : 0
% 2.54/1.60 #Define : 0
% 2.54/1.60 #Split : 0
% 2.54/1.60 #Chain : 0
% 2.54/1.60 #Close : 0
% 2.54/1.60
% 2.54/1.60 Ordering : KBO
% 2.54/1.60
% 2.54/1.60 Simplification rules
% 2.54/1.60 ----------------------
% 2.54/1.60 #Subsume : 29
% 2.54/1.60 #Demod : 4
% 2.54/1.60 #Tautology : 0
% 2.54/1.60 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.54/1.60 #BackRed : 1
% 2.54/1.60
% 2.54/1.60 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.54/1.60 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.54/1.60
% 2.54/1.60 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.54/1.60 ----------------------
% 2.54/1.60 Preprocessing : 0.37
% 2.54/1.60 Parsing : 0.19
% 2.54/1.60 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.54/1.60 Main loop : 0.19
% 2.54/1.60 Inferencing : 0.08
% 2.54/1.60 Reduction : 0.06
% 2.54/1.60 Demodulation : 0.04
% 2.54/1.61 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.54/1.61 Subsumption : 0.03
% 2.54/1.61 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.54/1.61 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.54/1.61 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.54/1.61 Total : 0.59
% 2.54/1.61 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.54/1.61 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.54/1.61 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.54/1.61 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------