TSTP Solution File: SYN075-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYN075-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:56:58 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (   5 unt;   8 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (  40 equ;  34 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X2) = X2
    | ~ big_f(X1,f(X2))
    | X1 != g(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).

cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,f(X2))
    | f(X2) = X2
    | X1 != g(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).

cnf(clause_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(h(X1,X2),f(X1))
    | h(X1,X2) = X2
    | f(X1) != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).

cnf(clause_1,axiom,
    ( X1 = a
    | ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).

cnf(clause_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1) != X1
    | h(X1,X2) != X2
    | ~ big_f(h(X1,X2),f(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_10) ).

cnf(clause_3,axiom,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | X1 != a
    | X2 != b ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X2) = X2
    | ~ big_f(X1,f(X2))
    | X1 != g(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,f(X2))
    | f(X2) = X2
    | X1 != g(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X2) = X2
    | ~ big_f(X1,f(X2))
    | X1 != g(X2) ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(h(X1,X2),f(X1))
    | h(X1,X2) = X2
    | f(X1) != X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,f(X2))
    | f(X2) = X2
    | X1 != g(X2) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1) = X1
    | ~ big_f(g(X1),f(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = a
    | ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(h(X1,X2),f(X1))
    | h(X1,X2) = X2
    | f(X1) != X1 ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    f(X1) = X1,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1) != X1
    | h(X1,X2) != X2
    | ~ big_f(h(X1,X2),f(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 = a
    | ~ big_f(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( h(X1,X2) = X2
    | big_f(h(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | X1 != a
    | X2 != b ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(X1) != X1
    | h(X1,X2) != X2
    | ~ big_f(h(X1,X2),f(X1)) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( h(X1,X2) = a
    | h(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | X1 != a
    | X2 != b ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( h(X1,X2) != X2
    | ~ big_f(h(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    h(X1,a) = a,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    big_f(a,b),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(a,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SYN075-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 15:23:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.51  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3738 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3743 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.20/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 25
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.20/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 22
% 0.20/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 0.20/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.20/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 19
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.20/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 9
% 0.20/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.20/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.20/0.51  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 10
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of those cached                   : 8
% 0.20/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 6
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.20/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 11
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.20/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.20/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.20/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.20/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 432
% 0.20/0.51  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 27
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1632 pages
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.20/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------