TSTP Solution File: SYN071+1 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : SYN071+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 02:10:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.55s 3.74s
% Output : Proof 3.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN071+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 17:47:07 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.55/3.74 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.74 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Or (Eq a b) (Eq c d)) True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Or (Eq a c) (Eq b d)) True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Or (Eq a d) (Eq b c))) True
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Or (Eq (Eq a c) True) (Eq (Eq b d) True)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): Or (Eq (Eq b d) True) (Eq a c)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): Or (Eq a c) (Eq b d)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #6 (by clausification #[0]): Or (Eq (Eq a b) True) (Eq (Eq c d) True)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): Or (Eq (Eq c d) True) (Eq a b)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): Or (Eq a b) (Eq c d)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #9 (by superposition #[8, 5]): Or (Eq c d) (Or (Eq b c) (Eq b d))
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #11 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (Or (Eq a d) (Eq b c)) False
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): Eq (Eq b c) False
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): Eq (Eq a d) False
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): Ne b c
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #15 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[14, 9]): Or (Eq c d) (Eq b d)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #16 (by clausification #[13]): Ne a d
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #17 (by superposition #[16, 5]): Or (Eq b d) (Ne c d)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #18 (by superposition #[16, 8]): Or (Eq c d) (Ne b d)
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #19 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[15, 17]): Eq b d
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #22 (by backward demodulation #[19, 14]): Ne d c
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #24 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[19, 18]): Eq c d
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #27 (by forward demodulation #[22, 24]): Ne c c
% 3.55/3.74 Clause #28 (by eliminate resolved literals #[27]): False
% 3.55/3.74 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------