TSTP Solution File: SYN070+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:23:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.71s 1.91s
% Output   : Refutation 1.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   6 unt;   8 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  13 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ big_f(A)
    | big_f(B)
    | big_g(A) ),
    file('SYN070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ big_f(A)
    | big_h(B,A)
    | big_g(A) ),
    file('SYN070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ big_f(A)
    | ~ big_g(B)
    | big_g(A) ),
    file('SYN070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ big_f(A)
    | big_g(A)
    | ~ big_f(B)
    | big_g(B)
    | big_j(dollar_c1,B) ),
    file('SYN070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(A)
    | big_g(A)
    | big_j(dollar_c1,A) ),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[4])])]),
    [iquote('copy,4,factor_simp,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ big_f(A)
    | ~ big_f(B)
    | ~ big_h(A,B)
    | ~ big_j(B,A) ),
    file('SYN070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ big_g(dollar_c2),
    file('SYN070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(A)
    | ~ big_h(A,A)
    | ~ big_j(A,A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[6]),
    [iquote('factor,6.1.2')] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    big_f(dollar_c2),
    file('SYN070+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    big_f(A),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,1]),7]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,1,unit_del,7')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ( big_g(A)
    | big_j(dollar_c1,A) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,5')] ).

cnf(14,plain,
    ( big_h(A,B)
    | big_g(B) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,2')] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    ( big_j(dollar_c1,A)
    | big_g(B) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[13,3,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,13,3,12')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    ( big_h(A,B)
    | big_g(C) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[14,3,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,14,3,12')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    big_j(dollar_c1,A),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,7]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,7')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    big_h(A,B),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,7]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,7')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,8,12,17]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,8,12,17')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SYN070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:14:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.71/1.91  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.71/1.91  The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 1.71/1.91  Wed Jul 27 11:14:08 2022
% 1.71/1.91  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 19761.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.71/1.91  set(auto).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.71/1.91  clear(print_given).
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  formula_list(usable).
% 1.71/1.91  all X Y (big_f(X)& (big_f(Y)&big_h(Y,X)->big_g(Y))->big_g(X)).
% 1.71/1.91  (exists X (big_f(X)& -big_g(X)))-> (exists X1 (big_f(X1)& -big_g(X1)& (all Y (big_f(Y)& -big_g(Y)->big_j(X1,Y))))).
% 1.71/1.91  all X Y (big_f(X)&big_f(Y)&big_h(X,Y)-> -big_j(Y,X)).
% 1.71/1.91  -(all X (big_f(X)->big_g(X))).
% 1.71/1.91  end_of_list.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  list(usable).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_f(X)|big_f(Y)|big_g(X).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_f(X)|big_h(Y,X)|big_g(X).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_f(X)| -big_g(Y)|big_g(X).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_f(X)|big_g(X)|big_f($c1).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_f(X)|big_g(X)| -big_g($c1).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_f(X)|big_g(X)| -big_f(Y)|big_g(Y)|big_j($c1,Y).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_f(X)| -big_f(Y)| -big_h(X,Y)| -big_j(Y,X).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] big_f($c2).
% 1.71/1.91  0 [] -big_g($c2).
% 1.71/1.91  end_of_list.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.71/1.91  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.71/1.91  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.71/1.91     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  ------------> process usable:
% 1.71/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -big_f(A)|big_f(B)|big_g(A).
% 1.71/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 2 [] -big_f(A)|big_h(B,A)|big_g(A).
% 1.71/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 3 [] -big_f(A)| -big_g(B)|big_g(A).
% 1.71/1.91    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] -big_f(A)|big_g(A)|big_f($c1).
% 1.71/1.91    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] -big_f(A)|big_g(A)| -big_g($c1).
% 1.71/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 5 [copy,4,factor_simp,factor_simp] -big_f(A)|big_g(A)|big_j($c1,A).
% 1.71/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 6 [] -big_f(A)| -big_f(B)| -big_h(A,B)| -big_j(B,A).
% 1.71/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 7 [] -big_g($c2).
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  ------------> process sos:
% 1.71/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 9 [] big_f($c2).
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 19 [hyper,18,8,12,17] $F.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.71/1.91  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.71/1.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.71/1.91  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  ============ end of search ============
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.71/1.91  clauses given                 10
% 1.71/1.91  clauses generated             15
% 1.71/1.91  clauses kept                  17
% 1.71/1.91  clauses forward subsumed       6
% 1.71/1.91  clauses back subsumed         10
% 1.71/1.91  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.71/1.91  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.71/1.91  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.71/1.91  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.71/1.91  
% 1.71/1.91  Process 19761 finished Wed Jul 27 11:14:10 2022
% 1.71/1.91  Otter interrupted
% 1.71/1.91  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------