TSTP Solution File: SYN070+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SYN070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 05:51:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   92 (  35   ~;  37   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  10 sgn  15   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(pel46,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( big_f(X1)
     => big_g(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',pel46) ).

fof(pel46_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( big_f(X1)
        & ( ( big_f(X2)
            & big_h(X2,X1) )
         => big_g(X2) ) )
     => big_g(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',pel46_1) ).

fof(pel46_2,axiom,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( big_f(X1)
        & ~ big_g(X1) )
   => ? [X3] :
        ( big_f(X3)
        & ~ big_g(X3)
        & ! [X2] :
            ( ( big_f(X2)
              & ~ big_g(X2) )
           => big_j(X3,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',pel46_2) ).

fof(pel46_3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( big_f(X1)
        & big_f(X2)
        & big_h(X1,X2) )
     => ~ big_j(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',pel46_3) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( big_f(X1)
       => big_g(X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel46]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X4,X4] :
      ( ( big_f(X4)
        | ~ big_f(X3)
        | big_g(X3) )
      & ( big_h(X4,X3)
        | ~ big_f(X3)
        | big_g(X3) )
      & ( ~ big_g(X4)
        | ~ big_f(X3)
        | big_g(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel46_1])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk2_0)
    & ~ big_g(esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X6] :
      ( ( big_f(esk1_0)
        | ~ big_f(X4)
        | big_g(X4) )
      & ( ~ big_g(esk1_0)
        | ~ big_f(X4)
        | big_g(X4) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X6)
        | big_g(X6)
        | big_j(esk1_0,X6)
        | ~ big_f(X4)
        | big_g(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pel46_2])])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ big_f(X3)
      | ~ big_f(X4)
      | ~ big_h(X3,X4)
      | ~ big_j(X4,X3) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pel46_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( big_g(X1)
    | big_f(X2)
    | ~ big_f(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_g(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( big_g(X1)
    | big_j(esk1_0,X2)
    | big_g(X2)
    | ~ big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( big_g(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_g(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ big_j(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_h(X2,X1)
    | ~ big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( big_j(esk1_0,X1)
    | big_g(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ big_j(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_h(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( big_j(esk1_0,X1)
    | big_g(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( big_g(X1)
    | big_h(X2,X1)
    | ~ big_f(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( big_g(X1)
    | ~ big_h(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( big_g(X1)
    | big_h(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( big_g(X1)
    | ~ big_g(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    big_g(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:04:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.41  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 114
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 2504 pages
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 16
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 15
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 16
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 10
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 679
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 2772 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------