TSTP Solution File: SYN070+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN070+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:44:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SYN070+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:12:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File : SYN070+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.19/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 46
% 0.19/0.61 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.61 % English :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.19/0.61 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.19/0.61 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [Hah94]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names : Pelletier 46 [Pel86]
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Theorem
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 4 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of connectives : 18 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 8 &)
% 0.19/0.61 % ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 8 ( 6 !; 2 ?)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments :
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 fof(pel46_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( ( big_f(X)
% 0.19/0.61 & ( ( big_f(Y)
% 0.19/0.61 & big_h(Y,X) )
% 0.19/0.61 => big_g(Y) ) )
% 0.19/0.61 => big_g(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 fof(pel46_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ? [X] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( big_f(X)
% 0.19/0.61 & ~ big_g(X) )
% 0.19/0.61 => ? [X1] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( big_f(X1)
% 0.19/0.61 & ~ big_g(X1)
% 0.19/0.61 & ! [Y] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( ( big_f(Y)
% 0.19/0.61 & ~ big_g(Y) )
% 0.19/0.61 => big_j(X1,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 fof(pel46_3,axiom,
% 0.19/0.61 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( ( big_f(X)
% 0.19/0.61 & big_f(Y)
% 0.19/0.61 & big_h(X,Y) )
% 0.19/0.61 => ~ big_j(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 fof(pel46,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( big_f(X)
% 0.19/0.61 => big_g(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.61 %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.61 %VarNum:21(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.19/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.61 %SharedTerms:6
% 0.19/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.19/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.61 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.61 [2]~P2(a1)
% 0.19/0.61 [4]~P1(x42)+P1(x41)+P2(x42)
% 0.19/0.61 [6]~P1(x61)+P2(x61)+~P2(x62)
% 0.19/0.61 [7]~P1(x71)+P2(x71)+P3(x72,x71)
% 0.19/0.61 [9]~P3(x92,x91)+~P4(x91,x92)+~P1(x91)+~P1(x92)
% 0.19/0.61 [8]~P1(x81)+~P1(x82)+P2(x81)+P2(x82)+P4(a2,x82)
% 0.19/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (~P2(x111)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,7,6])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P1(x121)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,7,6,4])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(18,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P3(x181,x182)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,12,7])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P1(x191)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(rename_variables,[],[12])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P4(a2,x211)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,12,19,7,8])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 ($false),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,18,21,9]),
% 0.19/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------