TSTP Solution File: SYN068+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:44:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:48:23 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % File : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.20/0.59 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 44
% 0.20/0.59 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.59 % English :
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.20/0.60 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.20/0.60 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.60 % Source : [Hah94]
% 0.20/0.60 % Names : Pelletier 44 [Pel86]
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.22 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.20/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 3 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of connectives : 9 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 5 &)
% 0.20/0.60 % ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of variables : 6 ( 2 !; 4 ?)
% 0.20/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 fof(pel44_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( big_f(X)
% 0.20/0.60 => ( ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( big_g(Y)
% 0.20/0.60 & big_h(X,Y) )
% 0.20/0.60 & ? [Y1] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( big_g(Y1)
% 0.20/0.60 & ~ big_h(X,Y1) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 fof(pel44_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60 ? [X] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( big_j(X)
% 0.20/0.60 & ! [Y] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( big_g(Y)
% 0.20/0.60 => big_h(X,Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 fof(pel44,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.60 ? [X] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( big_j(X)
% 0.20/0.60 & ~ big_f(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.60 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.60 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:6)
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.60 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.20/0.60 %goalClause: 2
% 0.20/0.60 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.60 [2]~P1(x21)+P2(x21)
% 0.20/0.60 [5]~P3(x51)+P4(a1,x51)
% 0.20/0.60 [3]~P2(x31)+P3(f2(x31))
% 0.20/0.60 [4]~P2(x41)+P3(f3(x41))
% 0.20/0.60 [6]~P2(x61)+P4(x61,f2(x61))
% 0.20/0.60 [7]~P2(x71)+~P4(x71,f3(x71))
% 0.20/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 ($false),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,7,4,3,5]),
% 0.20/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------