TSTP Solution File: SYN068+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.13s 1.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   5 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  12   ~;   5   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   6   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;   6   !;   4   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ big_h > big_j > big_g > big_f > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_3

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(big_h,type,
    big_h: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(big_g,type,
    big_g: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(big_f,type,
    big_f: $i > $o ).

tff(big_j,type,
    big_j: $i > $o ).

tff(f_46,axiom,
    ? [X] :
      ( big_j(X)
      & ! [Y] :
          ( big_g(Y)
         => big_h(X,Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel44_2) ).

tff(f_52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X] :
        ( big_j(X)
        & ~ big_f(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel44) ).

tff(f_39,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( big_f(X)
     => ( ? [Y] :
            ( big_g(Y)
            & big_h(X,Y) )
        & ? [Y1] :
            ( big_g(Y1)
            & ~ big_h(X,Y1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel44_1) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    big_j('#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_15,plain,
    ! [X_7] :
      ( big_f(X_7)
      | ~ big_j(X_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_19,plain,
    big_f('#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_15]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_1] :
      ( big_g('#skF_2'(X_1))
      | ~ big_f(X_1) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [Y_5] :
      ( big_h('#skF_3',Y_5)
      | ~ big_g(Y_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [X_12] :
      ( ~ big_h(X_12,'#skF_2'(X_12))
      | ~ big_f(X_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_39]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ( ~ big_f('#skF_3')
    | ~ big_g('#skF_2'('#skF_3')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_24]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    ~ big_g('#skF_2'('#skF_3')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_19,c_28]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ~ big_f('#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_31]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_19,c_34]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYN068+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:25:21 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.13/1.58  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.13/1.58  
% 2.13/1.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.13/1.61  
% 2.13/1.61  Inference rules
% 2.13/1.61  ----------------------
% 2.13/1.61  #Ref     : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #Sup     : 3
% 2.13/1.61  #Fact    : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #Define  : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #Split   : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #Chain   : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #Close   : 0
% 2.13/1.61  
% 2.13/1.61  Ordering : KBO
% 2.13/1.61  
% 2.13/1.61  Simplification rules
% 2.13/1.61  ----------------------
% 2.13/1.61  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #Demod        : 2
% 2.13/1.61  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.13/1.61  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.13/1.61  
% 2.13/1.61  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.13/1.61  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.13/1.61  
% 2.13/1.61  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.13/1.61  ----------------------
% 2.13/1.61  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 2.13/1.61  Parsing              : 0.26
% 2.13/1.61  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.13/1.61  Main loop            : 0.16
% 2.13/1.61  Inferencing          : 0.08
% 2.13/1.61  Reduction            : 0.03
% 2.13/1.61  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.13/1.61  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.13/1.61  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.13/1.61  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.13/1.61  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.13/1.61  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.13/1.61  Total                : 0.67
% 2.13/1.61  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.13/1.61  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.13/1.61  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.13/1.61  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------