TSTP Solution File: SYN063+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN063+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN063+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:48:33 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File : SYN063+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.19/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 33
% 0.19/0.61 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.61 % English :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.19/0.61 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.19/0.61 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [Hah94]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names : Pelletier 33 [Pel86]
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Theorem
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.11 v5.4.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 10 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of connectives : 12 ( 3 ~; 4 |; 2 &)
% 0.19/0.61 % ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 7 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments : This is a monadic predicate formulation of Pelletier 17.
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 fof(pel33,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( ( big_p(a)
% 0.19/0.61 & ( big_p(X)
% 0.19/0.61 => big_p(b) ) )
% 0.19/0.61 => big_p(c) )
% 0.19/0.61 <=> ! [X1] :
% 0.19/0.61 ( ( ~ big_p(a)
% 0.19/0.61 | big_p(X1)
% 0.19/0.61 | big_p(c) )
% 0.19/0.61 & ( ~ big_p(a)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ big_p(b)
% 0.19/0.61 | big_p(c) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.62 %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.62 %VarNum:2(SingletonVarNum:2)
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.62 %SharedTerms:13
% 0.19/0.62 %goalClause: 1 2 23 24 28
% 0.19/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.62 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.62 [2]~P1(a2)
% 0.19/0.62 [23]P1(a3)+~P1(a5)+~P1(a4)
% 0.19/0.62 [24]P1(a2)+~P1(a1)+~P1(a3)
% 0.19/0.62 [28]P1(x281)+P1(x282)+P1(a2)+~P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(32,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 ($false),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,28]),
% 0.19/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------