TSTP Solution File: SYN063+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN063+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:09:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.23s 1.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  10   ~;  13   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;  10   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ big_p > #nlpp > c > b > a > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(big_p,type,
    big_p: $i > $o ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i ).

tff(f_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X] :
          ( ( big_p(a)
            & ( big_p(X)
             => big_p(b) ) )
         => big_p(c) )
    <=> ! [X1] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(a)
            | big_p(X1)
            | big_p(c) )
          & ( ~ big_p(a)
            | ~ big_p(b)
            | big_p(c) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel33) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ big_p(c),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    big_p(a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    ! [X_1,X1_2] :
      ( big_p(X_1)
      | big_p(c)
      | big_p(X1_2)
      | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_114,plain,
    ! [X_1,X1_2] :
      ( big_p(X_1)
      | big_p(c)
      | big_p(X1_2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62,c_88]) ).

tff(c_136,plain,
    ! [X_1,X1_2] :
      ( big_p(X_1)
      | big_p(X1_2) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_114]) ).

tff(c_138,plain,
    ! [X1_2] : big_p(X1_2),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_136]) ).

tff(c_108,plain,
    ( big_p(c)
    | ~ big_p(b)
    | ~ big_p(a) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ( big_p(c)
    | ~ big_p(b) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62,c_108]) ).

tff(c_135,plain,
    ~ big_p(b),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_112]) ).

tff(c_144,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_138,c_135]) ).

tff(c_145,plain,
    ! [X_1] : big_p(X_1),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_136]) ).

tff(c_151,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_145,c_135]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN063+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:20:52 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.23/1.65  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.23/1.65  
% 2.23/1.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.80/1.70  
% 2.80/1.70  Inference rules
% 2.80/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.80/1.70  #Ref     : 0
% 2.80/1.70  #Sup     : 0
% 2.80/1.70  #Fact    : 0
% 2.80/1.70  #Define  : 0
% 2.80/1.70  #Split   : 1
% 2.80/1.70  #Chain   : 0
% 2.80/1.70  #Close   : 0
% 2.80/1.70  
% 2.80/1.70  Ordering : KBO
% 2.80/1.70  
% 2.80/1.70  Simplification rules
% 2.80/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.80/1.70  #Subsume      : 10
% 2.80/1.70  #Demod        : 27
% 2.80/1.70  #Tautology    : 42
% 2.80/1.70  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 2.80/1.70  #BackRed      : 4
% 2.80/1.70  
% 2.80/1.70  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.80/1.70  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.80/1.70  
% 2.80/1.70  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.80/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.80/1.70  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 2.80/1.70  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.80/1.70  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 2.80/1.70  Main loop            : 0.15
% 2.80/1.70  Inferencing          : 0.03
% 2.80/1.70  Reduction            : 0.04
% 2.80/1.70  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.80/1.70  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 2.80/1.70  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 2.80/1.70  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.80/1.70  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.80/1.70  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.80/1.70  Total                : 0.68
% 2.80/1.70  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.80/1.70  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.80/1.70  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.80/1.70  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------