TSTP Solution File: SYN059-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN059-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:56:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_38)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
big_f(a),
clause_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| big_j(X3)
| ~ big_g(X1)
| ~ big_f(X2)
| ~ big_g(X3) ),
c_0_38,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,axiom,
big_g(b),
clause_2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(d)
| big_j(X2)
| ~ big_f(X1)
| ~ big_g(X2) ),
c_0_46,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| big_h(X2)
| ~ big_f(X1)
| ~ big_f(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
big_f(e),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
big_h(e),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_69]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
big_f(c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_69]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
big_h(c),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_80]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| big_g(f)
| ~ big_g(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_74])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_92,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(f)
| big_g(d) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_74])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_j(f)
| ~ big_j(d) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(d)
| big_g(f) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| ~ big_j(d)
| ~ big_g(X2)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_90])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_113,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| ~ big_j(d)
| ~ big_g(X1)
| ~ big_f(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_90])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(f)
| ~ big_j(f) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_115,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| big_g(f)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_74])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_116,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| ~ big_j(f)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_74])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| ~ big_j(f)
| ~ big_g(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_74])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_118,negated_conjecture,
( big_g(d)
| ~ big_j(f) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_74])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_119,negated_conjecture,
( big_j(X1)
| big_h(X2)
| ~ big_g(X1)
| ~ big_f(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_50]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_120,negated_conjecture,
( big_h(X1)
| big_g(d)
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_50]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_121,negated_conjecture,
big_j(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_122,negated_conjecture,
big_h(a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_34]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN059-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:23:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2793 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with pid 2798 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # No proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 32
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 32
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 32
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 144
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 33
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 103
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 48
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 31
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 182
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 185
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 11
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 182
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 49
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 43
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 79
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 286
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 136
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 86
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3363
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 79
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.045 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------