TSTP Solution File: SYN059-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYN059-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:42:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output   : Saturation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_38)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    big_f(a),
    clause_1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_j(X1)
    | big_j(X3)
    | ~ big_g(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X2)
    | ~ big_g(X3) ),
    c_0_38,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_50,axiom,
    big_g(b),
    clause_2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_g(d)
    | big_j(X2)
    | ~ big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_g(X2) ),
    c_0_46,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_h(X1)
    | big_h(X2)
    | ~ big_f(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(e),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_37]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
    big_h(e),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_69]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_69]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
    big_h(c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_80]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_j(X1)
    | big_g(f)
    | ~ big_g(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_74])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_92,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_g(f)
    | big_g(d) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_74])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_j(f)
    | ~ big_j(d) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_j(d)
    | big_g(f) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_h(X1)
    | ~ big_j(d)
    | ~ big_g(X2)
    | ~ big_f(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_90])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_113,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_j(X1)
    | ~ big_j(d)
    | ~ big_g(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_90])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_g(f)
    | ~ big_j(f) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_115,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_h(X1)
    | big_g(f)
    | ~ big_f(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_74])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_116,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_h(X1)
    | ~ big_j(f)
    | ~ big_f(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_74])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_j(X1)
    | ~ big_j(f)
    | ~ big_g(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_74])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_118,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_g(d)
    | ~ big_j(f) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_74])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_119,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_j(X1)
    | big_h(X2)
    | ~ big_g(X1)
    | ~ big_f(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_50]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_120,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_h(X1)
    | big_g(d)
    | ~ big_f(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_50]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_121,negated_conjecture,
    big_j(b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_34]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_122,negated_conjecture,
    big_h(a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_34]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem    : SYN059-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 15:23:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.54  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25492 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with pid 25496 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # No proof found!
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 32
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 32
% 0.22/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 144
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.22/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 33
% 0.22/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 103
% 0.22/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 48
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 31
% 0.22/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 182
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 185
% 0.22/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11
% 0.22/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 182
% 0.22/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 49
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of those cached                   : 43
% 0.22/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 79
% 0.22/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 286
% 0.22/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 136
% 0.22/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 86
% 0.22/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.22/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3363
% 0.22/0.54  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 79
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.042 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.050 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.22/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------