TSTP Solution File: SYN056-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN056-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:42:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 1.17s 0.89s
% Output : Saturation 1.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_15)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
big_q(a),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_17]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
big_p(b),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( big_s(X2)
| ~ big_p(X1)
| ~ big_q(X2)
| ~ big_r(X1) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( big_r(X1)
| ~ big_p(X1)
| ~ big_q(X2)
| ~ big_s(X2) ),
c_0_26,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( big_r(X1)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_p(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
big_p(c),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_16]),c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( big_s(X1)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_q(X2)
| ~ big_p(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_37]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
big_q(d),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( big_s(d)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_p(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( big_r(X1)
| ~ big_p(X1)
| ~ big_r(c) ),
c_0_43,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
( big_r(X1)
| ~ big_q(c)
| ~ big_p(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_37]),c_0_39])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_r(c)
| ~ big_s(d) ),
c_0_46,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
( big_s(a)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_p(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
( big_s(X1)
| ~ big_q(c)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_p(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_49]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
( ~ big_s(d)
| ~ big_q(c) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_37]),c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
( big_s(X1)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_s(d) ),
c_0_51,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(a),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_52]),c_0_39])]),c_0_47]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
~ big_p(d),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_53]),c_0_39])]),c_0_48]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.08 % Problem : SYN056-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.28 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:33:38 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/0.89 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.17/0.89 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.17/0.89 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12400 completed with status 1
% 1.17/0.89 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.17/0.89 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.17/0.89 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.17/0.89 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.17/0.89 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12405 completed with status 1
% 1.17/0.89 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.17/0.89 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.17/0.89 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.17/0.89 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.17/0.89 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.89 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 1.17/0.89 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.17/0.89
% 1.17/0.89 # No proof found!
% 1.17/0.89 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 1.17/0.89 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 1.17/0.89 # Parsed axioms : 13
% 1.17/0.89 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Initial clauses : 13
% 1.17/0.89 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 1.17/0.89 # Processed clauses : 57
% 1.17/0.89 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # ...subsumed : 4
% 1.17/0.89 # ...remaining for further processing : 53
% 1.17/0.89 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 1.17/0.89 # Backward-rewritten : 13
% 1.17/0.89 # Generated clauses : 44
% 1.17/0.89 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 44
% 1.17/0.89 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 1.17/0.89 # Paramodulations : 44
% 1.17/0.89 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # NegExts : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Total rewrite steps : 29
% 1.17/0.89 # ...of those cached : 25
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.17/0.89 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.17/0.89 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.17/0.89 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.17/0.89 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.17/0.89 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 1.17/0.89 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 1.17/0.89 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.17/0.89 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 1.17/0.89 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.17/0.89 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Current number of archived clauses : 35
% 1.17/0.89 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 33
% 1.17/0.89 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 1.17/0.89 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 1.17/0.89 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 1.17/0.89 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 1.17/0.89 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 1.17/0.89 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.17/0.89 # Termbank termtop insertions : 907
% 1.17/0.89 # Search garbage collected termcells : 30
% 1.17/0.89
% 1.17/0.89 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.17/0.89 # User time : 0.004 s
% 1.17/0.89 # System time : 0.001 s
% 1.17/0.89 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 1.17/0.89 # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 1.17/0.89
% 1.17/0.89 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.17/0.89 # User time : 0.016 s
% 1.17/0.89 # System time : 0.006 s
% 1.17/0.89 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 1.17/0.89 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 1.17/0.89 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.17/0.89 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------