TSTP Solution File: SYN055-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN055-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN055-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:00:52 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.53 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.58 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.58 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.58 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.58 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.58 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58 % File : SYN055-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.19/0.58 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.58 % Problem : Pelletier Problem 25
% 0.19/0.58 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.58 % English :
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.19/0.58 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.19/0.58 % Source : [Pel86]
% 0.19/0.58 % Names : Pelletier 25 [Pel86]
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.58 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.19/0.58 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 1 unt; 2 nHn; 7 RR)
% 0.19/0.58 % Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% 0.19/0.58 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.58 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.58 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.19/0.58 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.58 % Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.58 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 % Comments :
% 0.19/0.58 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58 cnf(clause_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.58 big_p(a) ).
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 cnf(clause_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.58 ( ~ big_f(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | ~ big_g(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | ~ big_r(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 cnf(clause_3,axiom,
% 0.19/0.58 ( ~ big_p(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | big_f(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 cnf(clause_4,axiom,
% 0.19/0.58 ( ~ big_p(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | big_g(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 cnf(clause_5,axiom,
% 0.19/0.58 ( ~ big_p(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | big_q(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | big_p(b) ) ).
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.58 ( ~ big_p(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | big_q(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | big_r(b) ) ).
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.58 ( ~ big_q(X)
% 0.19/0.58 | ~ big_p(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.58 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.58 %VarNum:13(SingletonVarNum:6)
% 0.19/0.58 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.19/0.58 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.58 %SharedTerms:5
% 0.19/0.58 %goalClause: 4 6
% 0.19/0.58 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.58 [2]~P1(x21)+P2(x21)
% 0.19/0.58 [3]~P1(x31)+P3(x31)
% 0.19/0.58 [4]~P4(x41)+~P1(x41)
% 0.19/0.58 [5]~P1(x51)+P4(x51)+P1(a2)
% 0.19/0.58 [6]~P1(x61)+P4(x61)+P5(a2)
% 0.19/0.58 [7]~P3(x71)+~P5(x71)+~P2(x71)
% 0.19/0.58 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.59 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.19/0.59 (P5(a2)),
% 0.19/0.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,3,2,7,6])).
% 0.19/0.59 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.19/0.59 (P1(a2)),
% 0.19/0.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,3,2,7,6,5])).
% 0.19/0.59 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.59 (~P3(a2)),
% 0.19/0.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,16,7,2])).
% 0.19/0.59 cnf(23,plain,
% 0.19/0.59 ($false),
% 0.19/0.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[22,16,3]),
% 0.19/0.59 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------