TSTP Solution File: SYN052-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:07:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 3 unt; 2 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1)
| p ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1)
| ~ p ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| ~ big_f(a) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( p
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1)
| p ),
clause_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( big_f(X1)
| ~ p ),
clause_2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p
| ~ big_f(a) ),
clause_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
big_f(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p
| ~ big_f(X1) ),
clause_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7])]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.07 % Problem : SYN052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.07 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.06/0.25 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.06/0.25 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 00:47:09 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.27 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.27 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.10/0.27 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.10/0.27 #
% 0.10/0.27 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.27
% 0.10/0.27 # Proof found!
% 0.10/0.27 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.27 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.27 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------