TSTP Solution File: SYN050+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN050+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:20:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.72s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 0.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 60 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 69 ( 24 ~; 15 |; 20 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 41 !; 16 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0] : big_p(X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] : ~ big_r(X2)
& big_q(X1)
& big_p(X0) )
& ! [X3,X4] :
( big_r(sK0(X3,X4))
| ~ big_q(X4)
| ~ big_p(X3) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ? [X5] :
( big_r(X5)
| ~ big_q(X4)
| ~ big_p(X3) )
=> ( big_r(sK0(X3,X4))
| ~ big_q(X4)
| ~ big_p(X3) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] : ~ big_r(X2)
& big_q(X1)
& big_p(X0) )
& ! [X3,X4] :
? [X5] :
( big_r(X5)
| ~ big_q(X4)
| ~ big_p(X3) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ! [X4,X5] :
( ! [X6] : ~ big_r(X6)
& big_q(X5)
& big_p(X4) )
& ! [X0,X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( big_r(X2)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_p(X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ! [X4,X5] :
( ! [X6] : ~ big_r(X6)
& big_q(X5)
& big_p(X4) )
& ! [X0,X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( big_r(X2)
| ~ big_q(X1)
| ~ big_p(X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
~ ( ! [X0,X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( ( big_q(X1)
& big_p(X0) )
=> big_r(X2) )
=> ? [X4,X5] :
( ( big_q(X5)
& big_p(X4) )
=> ? [X6] : big_r(X6) ) ),
inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X0,X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( ( big_q(X1)
& big_p(X0) )
=> ( big_s(X3)
& big_r(X2) ) )
=> ? [X4,X5] :
( ( big_q(X5)
& big_p(X4) )
=> ? [X6] : big_r(X6) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ! [X0,X1] :
? [X2] :
! [X3] :
( ( big_q(X1)
& big_p(X0) )
=> ( big_s(X3)
& big_r(X2) ) )
=> ? [X4,X5] :
( ( big_q(X5)
& big_p(X4) )
=> ? [X6] : big_r(X6) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel20) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X1] : big_q(X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ big_q(X4)
| ~ big_p(X3) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X2] : ~ big_r(X2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( big_r(sK0(X3,X4))
| ~ big_q(X4)
| ~ big_p(X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN050+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:13:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.14/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.72/0.90 % (24212)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24214)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24215)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24213)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24216)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24218)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24212)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24215)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24216)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24214)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)First to succeed.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24218)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24213)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24219)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-24211"
% 0.72/0.90 % (24219)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.72/0.90 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.72/0.90 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.72/0.90
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)Memory used [KB]: 955
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.90 % (24217)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.90 % (24211)Success in time 0.529 s
% 0.72/0.90 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------