TSTP Solution File: SYN050+1 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN050+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 02:10:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.35s 3.53s
% Output   : Proof 3.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.14  % Problem    : SYN050+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.16  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 19:46:26 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.35/3.53  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/3.53  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.35/3.53    (Not
% 3.35/3.53      ((∀ (X Y : Iota), Exists fun Z => ∀ (W : Iota), And (big_p X) (big_q Y) → And (big_r Z) (big_s W)) →
% 3.35/3.53        Exists fun X1 => Exists fun Y1 => And (big_p X1) (big_q Y1) → Exists fun Z1 => big_r Z1))
% 3.35/3.53    True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq
% 3.35/3.53    (Not
% 3.35/3.53      ((∀ (X Y : Iota), Exists fun Z => ∀ (W : Iota), And (big_p X) (big_q Y) → And (big_r Z) (big_s W)) →
% 3.35/3.53        Exists fun X1 => Exists fun Y1 => And (big_p X1) (big_q Y1) → Exists big_r))
% 3.35/3.53    True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq
% 3.35/3.53    ((∀ (X Y : Iota), Exists fun Z => ∀ (W : Iota), And (big_p X) (big_q Y) → And (big_r Z) (big_s W)) →
% 3.35/3.53      Exists fun X1 => Exists fun Y1 => And (big_p X1) (big_q Y1) → Exists big_r)
% 3.35/3.53    False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), Exists fun Z => ∀ (W : Iota), And (big_p X) (big_q Y) → And (big_r Z) (big_s W)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (Exists fun X1 => Exists fun Y1 => And (big_p X1) (big_q Y1) → Exists big_r) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Exists fun Z => ∀ (W : Iota), And (big_p a) (big_q Y) → And (big_r Z) (big_s W)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Z => ∀ (W : Iota), And (big_p a) (big_q a_1) → And (big_r Z) (big_s W)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (∀ (W : Iota), And (big_p a) (big_q a_1) → And (big_r (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2)) (big_s W)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (And (big_p a) (big_q a_1) → And (big_r (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2)) (big_s a_3)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.35/3.53    Or (Eq (And (big_p a) (big_q a_1)) False) (Eq (And (big_r (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2)) (big_s a_3)) True)
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.35/3.53    Or (Eq (And (big_r (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2)) (big_s a_3)) True) (Or (Eq (big_p a) False) (Eq (big_q a_1) False))
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (big_p a) False) (Or (Eq (big_q a_1) False) (Eq (big_r (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2)) True))
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #13 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Y1 => And (big_p a) (big_q Y1) → Exists big_r) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (And (big_p a) (big_q a_1) → Exists big_r) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (And (big_p a) (big_q a_1)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #16 (by clausification #[14]): Eq (Exists big_r) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #17 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (big_q a) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #18 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (big_p a) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #20 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (big_r a) False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #23 (by forward demodulation #[12, 18]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (big_q a) False) (Eq (big_r (skS.0 0 a_1 a a_2)) True))
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (big_q a) False) (Eq (big_r (skS.0 0 a_1 a a_2)) True)
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #25 (by forward demodulation #[24, 17]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (big_r (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2)) True)
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (big_r (skS.0 0 a a_1 a_2)) True
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #27 (by superposition #[26, 20]): Eq True False
% 3.35/3.53  Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): False
% 3.35/3.53  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------