TSTP Solution File: SYN034-1 by Bliksem---1.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem : SYN034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : bliksem %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 02:46:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 1.09s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SYN034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 06:31:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/1.09 *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.42/1.09 *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.42/1.09 *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.42/1.09 Bliksem 1.12
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 Clauses:
% 0.42/1.09 [
% 0.42/1.09 [ p( X, a ), p( X, f( X ) ) ],
% 0.42/1.09 [ p( X, a ), p( f( X ), X ) ],
% 0.42/1.09 [ ~( p( X, Y ) ), ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ) ]
% 0.42/1.09 ] .
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 0.333333
% 0.42/1.09 This a non-horn, non-equality problem
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 Options Used:
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 useres = 1
% 0.42/1.09 useparamod = 0
% 0.42/1.09 useeqrefl = 0
% 0.42/1.09 useeqfact = 0
% 0.42/1.09 usefactor = 1
% 0.42/1.09 usesimpsplitting = 0
% 0.42/1.09 usesimpdemod = 0
% 0.42/1.09 usesimpres = 3
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 resimpinuse = 1000
% 0.42/1.09 resimpclauses = 20000
% 0.42/1.09 substype = standard
% 0.42/1.09 backwardsubs = 1
% 0.42/1.09 selectoldest = 5
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 litorderings [0] = split
% 0.42/1.09 litorderings [1] = liftord
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 termordering = none
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 litapriori = 1
% 0.42/1.09 termapriori = 0
% 0.42/1.09 litaposteriori = 0
% 0.42/1.09 termaposteriori = 0
% 0.42/1.09 demodaposteriori = 0
% 0.42/1.09 ordereqreflfact = 0
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 litselect = none
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 maxweight = 15
% 0.42/1.09 maxdepth = 30000
% 0.42/1.09 maxlength = 115
% 0.42/1.09 maxnrvars = 195
% 0.42/1.09 excuselevel = 1
% 0.42/1.09 increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 maxselected = 10000000
% 0.42/1.09 maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 showgenerated = 0
% 0.42/1.09 showkept = 0
% 0.42/1.09 showselected = 0
% 0.42/1.09 showdeleted = 0
% 0.42/1.09 showresimp = 1
% 0.42/1.09 showstatus = 2000
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 prologoutput = 1
% 0.42/1.09 nrgoals = 5000000
% 0.42/1.09 totalproof = 1
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 {} [0, 0] (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/1.09 . [1, 2] (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/1.09 ! [4, 1] (w:0, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/1.09 = [13, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/1.09 ==> [14, 2] (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/1.09 a [40, 0] (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/1.09 p [41, 2] (w:1, o:43, a:1, s:1, b:0),
% 0.42/1.09 f [42, 1] (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 Starting Search:
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.42/1.09 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/1.09 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 0, [ p( X, a ), p( X, f( X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 1, [ p( f( X ), X ), p( X, a ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 2, [ ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ), ~( p( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 3, [ ~( p( a, X ) ), ~( p( X, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 4, [ ~( p( X, a ) ), ~( p( X, X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 5, [ ~( p( a, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 8, [ p( f( a ), a ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 11, [ ~( p( f( a ), a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 12, [] )
% 0.42/1.09 .
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/1.09 found a proof!
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 initialclauses(
% 0.42/1.09 [ clause( 14, [ p( X, a ), p( X, f( X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 15, [ p( X, a ), p( f( X ), X ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 16, [ ~( p( X, Y ) ), ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 ] ).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 subsumption(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 0, [ p( X, a ), p( X, f( X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 14, [ p( X, a ), p( X, f( X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 ), ==>( 1,
% 0.42/1.09 1 )] ) ).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 subsumption(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 1, [ p( f( X ), X ), p( X, a ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 15, [ p( X, a ), p( f( X ), X ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 1 ), ==>( 1,
% 0.42/1.09 0 )] ) ).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 subsumption(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 2, [ ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ), ~( p( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 16, [ ~( p( X, Y ) ), ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 2
% 0.42/1.09 ), ==>( 1, 0 ), ==>( 2, 1 )] ) ).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 factor(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 20, [ ~( p( X, a ) ), ~( p( a, X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 2, [ ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ), ~( p( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , 0, 1, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, a ), :=( Y, X )] )).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 subsumption(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 3, [ ~( p( a, X ) ), ~( p( X, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 20, [ ~( p( X, a ) ), ~( p( a, X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 1 ), ==>( 1,
% 0.42/1.09 0 )] ) ).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 factor(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 24, [ ~( p( X, X ) ), ~( p( X, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 2, [ ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ), ~( p( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , 0, 2, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, X )] )).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 subsumption(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 4, [ ~( p( X, a ) ), ~( p( X, X ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 24, [ ~( p( X, X ) ), ~( p( X, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 1 ), ==>( 1,
% 0.42/1.09 0 )] ) ).
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09
% 0.42/1.09 factor(
% 0.42/1.09 clause( 27, [ ~( p( X, X ) ), ~( p( X, a ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , clause( 2, [ ~( p( Y, X ) ), ~( p( Y, a ) ), ~( p( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.42/1.09 , 0, 2, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, X )] )).
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09 factor(
% 0.74/1.09 clause( 28, [ ~( p( a, a ) ) ] )
% 0.74/1.09 , clause( 27, [ ~( p( X, X ) ), ~( p( X, a ) ) ] )
% 0.74/1.09 , 0, 1, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, a )] )).
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09 subsumption(
% 0.74/1.09 clause( 5, [ ~( p( a, a ) ) ] )
% 0.74/1.09 , clause( 28, [ ~( p( a, a ) ) ] )
% 0.74/1.09 , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09 ==> clause( 8, [ p( f( a ), a ) ] )
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09 !!! Internal Problem: OH, OH, COULD NOT DERIVE GOAL !!!
% 0.74/1.09
% 0.74/1.09 Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------