%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN014-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:17:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN014-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 23:46:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS derived 71 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 63 clauses.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS allocated 63146 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 8 :
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  2[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* -> equalish(v,u).
% 0.19/0.41  3[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* equalish(v,w)* -> equalish(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.41  22[0:Inp] || equalish(m,n)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.41  23[0:Inp] ||  -> equalish(n,k)*r.
% 0.19/0.41  26[0:Inp] ||  -> equalish(m,k)*r.
% 0.19/0.41  41[0:Res:23.0,2.0] ||  -> equalish(k,n)*l.
% 0.19/0.41  93[0:OCh:3.1,3.0,41.0,26.0] ||  -> equalish(m,n)*l.
% 0.19/0.41  100[0:MRR:93.0,22.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  Formulae used in the proof : symmetryish transitivityish c_19 c_20 c_23
% 0.19/0.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------